It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Despicable me" - peadophilia out does disneys.WTF!- must see VID

page: 8
6
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12345lonestar
It seems a lot of this stuff is a bit of a stretch...He clearly says "Put on your pJ's" IN any two hour movie you can find clips that might look suggestive. Most of the clips shown are taken out of context. Making different depths look odd. That one guy is a little but of a creeper. But other than that nothing i see really makes a good case for itself like some of the Disney movies which are CLEARLY identifiable.

Heck just torn on the TV and relate what people say to something sexual and it will start seeming like every other sentence is a sexual innuendo.

Heck here is a basic Nascar race. Just think of everything they as being sexual and almost everything they say will seem perverted.



this post with the nascar made me lmao!!, good one also I agree to an extent but the scene with the kid choking the chiken?, yeah I got that a little too obvious and the Disney corp does put inuendo's in their movies, hence alladin "all good teenagers take their clothes off" when alladin is on the balcony or the word sex when simba lays down, dont give me the it was the special effects department putting SFX in the movie, if they are smart to get that job they know what the hell they are doing OH and the woody the guy marrying ariel had on the little mermaid or the fact that the box to that movie has a penis on it, its funny to catch these things and sick to know that they want your children to watch it.
edit on 23-3-2011 by hapablab because: I can't spell for poopy thats why




posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:06 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


It should be noted here that Despicable Me is not connected in any way with Disney nor Pixar. It is a Universal Film. About the only connection, aside from perhaps being made in California is that Julie Andrews was used as one of the voice talents.

That may or may not sway this discussion, people see what they want to see, but in the end, be accurate with the facts, if you can.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:08 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


You guys are sick, this is the same as those people who think that every song is about drugs or violence. All I got to say is get a life and enjoy this world, you only live once.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:13 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Oh jeez. Of course vector was meant to be like Lord Fawkward from Shrek and male dominated. But everything they showed was not true, specifically the first part was his patch. Accents can get misread. It was not anything different than the script.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by thePharaoh

Originally posted by spolvil
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Hmm - the photocopying scene??? How many countless times has that been done as a gag over the years? In what way can you associate that with pedophilia?


you didnt see the picture get stabbed by a large phallis.......you didnt see the phallis grow on the showing of the picture off the ass....

im begining to think that you lot are not worth the bother....either your in denial or a pead.. i cant see what else you lot could be....too many contraversial coincidences...

ok what about the scene when one minion pounces on the other and shakes him untill he glows.
what did you think he was doing to him when he first pounced....im sure "turning him into a glow tube" didnt come in your head....but your brain did search for a split second for an answer.....
edit on 23-3-2011 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)


I have to admit, the picture of the butt getting stabbed by something which can only be described as phallic in that it is capable of stabbing might be a little questionable. But considering the intense subtlety of it, the fact that it doesn't actually suggest anything sexual except for people who are watching for that, strongly suggests that it was either accidental or meant to get a laugh out of adult audiences. Or, and here's a stretch, maybe they were thinking that "Hey, a butt getting stabbed is funny." Here's the conversation that the writers had after they thought that up, I'm sure:
Writer 1: Hehe, butt getting stabbed. It's butt humor and violence! Kids'll love that!
Writer 2: Hey, do you think maybe that might be a little sexual?
Writer 1: Huh... Good point... *think think* Nah. I mean, maybe, but...
Writer 2: Yeah, who's going to even think of it that way besides some nut on the internet?

As for claims that it encourages pedophilia: There are no children in that scene. At least not involved in the event.

And the scene when one minion pounces on the other -- I thought he was just attacking the glowstick minion. It was a bewildering moment of psychosis exhibited by a so-far just weird piece of mutant corn.

reply to post by thePharaoh
 


My god, they're all bald and friendly looking! They absolutely must be pedo--- no, seriously, what's your point?

And, it's been said before, but I gotta say it again -- if your penis looks like that, go see a doctor.

But in seriousness -- How can you possibly be claiming we're all in denial? We here on this website are some of the absolute best about seeing things that aren't there, finding messages that no one is delivering, and getting all worked up over nothing. So when we as a unit reject something as subliminal messages, you have to admit that it must be extremely far-fetched.

Even Glenn Beck wouldn't use this as evidence that George Soros was trying to resurrect Communist Michael Jackson to rape children. That is how weak this evidence is.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by b4apalehorse
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


It should be noted here that Despicable Me is not connected in any way with Disney nor Pixar. It is a Universal Film. About the only connection, aside from perhaps being made in California is that Julie Andrews was used as one of the voice talents.

That may or may not sway this discussion, people see what they want to see, but in the end, be accurate with the facts, if you can.


Which means even the title of this thread is a joke!!

----------
I'm beginning to think some people just want to be offended. Maybe it gives them something to talk about and makes them feel important.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:28 AM
link   
I've seen the movie several times. This is the lamerst excuse for a conspiracy I've even seen.

You can make everything dirty if you chop it up and look for the dirt. In reality, though, all of the scenes that were shown in your clip were perfectly and completely innocent.

I didnt see one thing that was offensive. Only a pedophile would watch that movie and take such baseless and perverted things from it.

yeah, OP, yah heard me
edit on 23-3-2011 by SPACEYstranger because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:35 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


With all due respect: You seriously need to get laid.

That's the most ludicrous claim ever, I see no sexual innuendo here.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:39 AM
link   
It is sincerely not my intent to offend anyone or imply anything negative about anyone. And, as always, I could be wrong. But I have watched the film, and never once did any of this even occur to me. So it seems likely (at least to me) that one really does have to go quite far out of their way to look for these things in order to even have them occur to you in the first place. Some of these (again, to me) are reaching so far that I really have to wonder why someone would even think of them. You have to already be in that mind-set, or at least be looking for it because you routinely fear finding such content in films, for it to even be an issue in my opinion.
edit on 3/23/2011 by AceWombat04 because: typo



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:42 AM
link   
I dont understand what the big deal is here, there is quite a few people who actually are getting mad at this thread, who cares whether or not there is a innuendo, its actually a funny thread and he does make a point, there are sexual refs in a lot of cartoons mainly disney and come on already lighten up, dont let this thread get your panties in a bunch.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by hapablab
I dont understand what the big deal is here, there is quite a few people who actually are getting mad at this thread, who cares whether or not there is a innuendo, its actually a funny thread and he does make a point, there are sexual refs in a lot of cartoons mainly disney and come on already lighten up, dont let this thread get your panties in a bunch.


For me it's not that anyone needs to "lighten up" other than the OP, it's how stupid, ridiculous and easily lead he or she is to even agree with that pointless video created by someone with too much time on their hands and trying to make something out of nothing.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:01 PM
link   
its just some split second clips taken way way out of context



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   
Well thats 4 minutes of my life i'll never get back.. I didnt see anything subliminal about that video...
Only creative editing. This may be the stupidest post i've seen on ats to date.. fail



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by thePharaoh
i was on youtube and came across this video exposing the pixar cartoon "despicable me'
i thought the film had obvious illuminati subliminal messages, in no way was i prepared for the sexual side to the cartoon...i watched the film in 3D, i did kind of notice that there was a large number of phallic`s waving in childrens faces....but watch this:...some of it is very shocking...i cant believe i never noticed....i need a shower.




now you feel as sick as me...well nearly...it goes on,

you saw the scene with the pink penis...well i saw a catholic review, as the catholic church endorses the film.

"Catholic viewers will especially appreciate a scene of the little orphans devoutly reciting their bedtime prayers."
www.catholicreview.org...

p.s. i cant believe i took my nephews to see it....
edit on 23-3-2011 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)


It is really disgusting to see what the perverted minds of others interpret this innocent cartoon....



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by imawlinn
 


I couldn't agree more.... My god, some people need to get a life!



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:08 PM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


C'mon, there's nothing in that movie, in real-time speed that is offending.
Geee...



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Right... without getting into how completely NON-sexual that scene was (seriously, only a farking perv actually looking for it would think that), this film is neither a Disney, nor a Pixar production, so if you're going to point the finger, make sure you know how to aim first.



It is also the highest-grossing non-Shrek/non-Disney·Pixar animated film of all time in these territories.

Source



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:23 PM
link   
reply to post by hapablab
 


Uhm, no. He's not making any good points about sexual innuendo in cartoons. He needs to be talking about actual innuendo to even be able to make a point.

He's also insulting those of us who don't "see" what he does, calling us blind and in denial. He is the one who needs to lighten up; he's the one seeing penises everywhere in a kids' movie and being horrified. I don't think you're paying any attention to this thread...



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   
There is something sexually suggestive in almost every minute of our daily lives.

If I see spilled milk on the floor, I don't jump and hump anything. It's just milk.

My seat belt is not a S&M device.

My tube socks are not intentionally in the shape of a condom.

"Despicable Me" Did not make me amorous.

Can some of the images be taken as suggestive of something else? Sure but...

Sometimes, a movie is just a movie.

IMO



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


that is clearly put in as a penis...it even has a foreskin...and testicles...lol!

i mean if you cant see it, then maybe your desensitised, but that IS a phallic representation.


ROTFL!

NOOOOOO, if we do not see it it means we're not looking for PERV stuff that isn't there.

Believe you me, if there was anyone that would pick up subliminal messages aimed to sexualy manipulate children it would be me - (for many reasons I will not share in this thread).

The whole video clip - IMO - is nothing but BS. Though it does leave me something to think about.
If 'beauty is in the mind of the beholder' then I can' thelp but wonder what's in the 'mind' of the OP.

*shudders*

peace




top topics



 
6
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join