libya: UN refuses to take lead...so who will.....?, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 22-3-2011 @ 11:02 PM by thePharaoh
i wrote this as i want to make people aware of what is happening...if you dont know already!

ok...the attacks on libya...are being led by namely the US and France.

france and the US are having their own little sqabbles, namely over the enivitable `prizes` of war.

though as it is a UN mandate that the US and france are upholding, it would be inconceivable for the world to sit back and let these two dictate libyas future.

now the UN has rifts internally over this `attack` namely from the germans and turkey.
turkey say: " internal issues of a country is none elses concern"
and germany refuse to be made puppets by zionists...again...also moneywise..they dont want to destroy business ties, in this manner!

both germany and turkey are taking the lead from the arab league...who thought a no-fly zone meant a no fly zone...naive hey!

as the UN are stalling taking control, the US are recomending an alternative body to take the lead...i will list three bodies, you can choose who shall lead:

1) the African Union
2) the Arab League
3) or wait..halt attacks untill the UN lead this..legally

now guess who the US are trying to use as an alternative to the UN??.....NATO...the North atlantic Treaty organisation....cmon WTF!...this isnt N.atlantic..its N. Africa (in case they didnt do geography in schoo)l

the excuse is that all of the NATO countries bar germany are already involved...i dont like this controlled argument where they pretend one of the allies disagrees....like france disagreed attacking iraq but i guess their troops didnt get that memo.

NATO is not an alternative to the UN....it like getting and force made up of asain countries, going to save UTAH.

my main concern is:

it will be NATO vs LIBYA....this only means one thing.....LIBYA WILL ENLIST MANY ALLIES FROM THIS MOVE...including a split egypt, turkey, syria, lebanon, algeris, morrocco....even countries that depend on the US like saudi and jordan will not like this.

if they try to hide behind NATO....It could be a very bad move in the long run of this odessey. (see what i did there:lol

has anyone else noticed that this could be very big if NATO take control
edit on 22-3-2011 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-3-2011 @ 03:31 AM by kwakakev
If any organisation has the right to step in the it is the African Union, which is demanding an end to the Military strikes allafrica.com... . It is the role of the African Union to be involved in political issues such as confronting undemocratic regimes. en.wikipedia.org... . There has been a lot of tension in the Ivory Coast recently as its leader refused to leave after an election. Their where many reports of France wanting to send in its military to take him out, which would have resulted in a civil war. The African Union has been working on this situation and is making progress towards a peaceful resolution.

If the west is interested in promoting peace in the region then it should be supporting the African Union. If the west just wants another crusade then it is on the right path. Military boredom, oil and other plunder, political control, destabilising the region and promoting global conflict are the main reasons I see for this invasion.

Gaddafi is also a promoter and supporter of the introduction for a standard, gold backed dinar currency for the African and Arab region. Just looked what happened to JFK when he tried to get rid of the fiat.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags