It's the religions that play with people's minds. Long before the
abrahamic religions, homosexuality was part of many cultures.
Even in Africa, it was part of many rituals.
There is no goal to homosexuality. Nature is simply not perfect.
In a society where sexuality would be zero-repressed, where
different sexual orientation would be not only accepted but
regarded as natural and "cool", the gay and bisexual
percentage of society would rise up to 30%. And
it would be a normal number, because, indeed
most people are more bisexual than they allow
themselves to be, and there is only a fraction
of society that is 100% gay or 100% hetero.
Desire and affection are stronger than gender.
Males have sex easily with other males
when in prison. It's the taboo that makes
that there is less gays.
Also, the recipe to create a man is slightly
more complicated in the belly of a woman.
I think that's why there is more gay men
than gay female, because the recipe is
easily messed up. This is all ok, though,
because men want to have sex 10 times
more than women. So with all the women
refusals, it is very tempting for men
(in a pre-religion context: think prehistory)
to just go at it with other men. And I think
that's why the anus is rightly serviable,
wrether you find it disgusting or not.
It's way too easy to have anal sex to
not ponder if nature didn't make it
so to make sexual addicts just have
a go without indeed creating too
much babies. And I'm sure women
used it for pregnancy control too.
But I don't think it's so much a way
to have less baby made than a way
to pare with the problem of men
wanting to have sex so much.
In fact, more argument for anal sex
being something that nature wants:
after the initial pain, men can both
reach the female G Point or the man
prostate through the anal, which can create
pleasure (straight men may experiment
this with toys). Why would anal sex
create pleasure for the receiver if it
wasn't intended by nature????
I'm not an anal sex practioner, by the way,
because I do find it a little yucky, but I
find a biological logic to anal sex.
edit on 24-3-2011 by Teorema because: typo
edit on 24-3-2011 by Teorema because: responds = pare.. not sure of the word to use
(me no anglo).
edit on 24-3-2011 by Teorema because: (no reason given)