It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Turkenstein
reply to post by WeAreAWAKE
You're gonna love me for this one! No, some people are just weaker minded than others and prefer the safety of what they know, which is their own sex. I think it is a fear of having to compete with other men for females or vise versa that drive them into the arms of an unatural lover. If you tell yourself something enough you can convince yourself that you have always "just been that way." NOT A HATER JUST A STATER.....LOL
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
It's stupid. Just making sure that's clear before people post.
Why is it stupid? Well, if everyone was a woman we wouldn't have children either. Same with if everyone was born male. Hell, if everyone was born sterile we wouldn't have children. Does this make being a woman, man, or sterile wrong? Of course not.
In fact, there simply isn't a good argument for calling homosexuality immoral. All of them are as ridiculous as the aforementioned.
Originally posted by voidla
The way I see it is, people who are gay are a huge benefit when it comes to the human population.
You have a machine that pumps out whatever, those whatevers then create more whatevers, bear in mind, theres only so much space these whatevers can fill.
So, now the machine pumps out something, that something adds to the whatever population, but doesn't breed more, slowing down the reproduction to keep space available for future whatevers.
That's a little complicated.
Basicly, men and women who are gay, who can reproduce through artificial insemination etc etc, keep populations under control, in a sense.
I mean, you have idiots who produce children when there is only so much space, jobs, money, food in a place, then you have gay people, so, contribute to population, but slow down reproduction for the future
Originally posted by WeAreAWAKE
reply to post by gncnew
violating moral principles; not conforming to the patterns of conduct usually accepted or established as consistent with principles of personal and social ethics.
licentious or lascivious.