Did you forget bush#41 was on saddam's back porch back in 1991 and left him in power? Did you forget we loaded him up with arms and chemicals?
blaming clinton for this war is like blaming the "reptiloids" for spraying chem trails. In other words, it's bull.
republicans...take responsibility for you own failures. Bush war support is high, but much lower than his father's. His job approval rating at home
is 50%. In phantom polls not commissioned by fox news, he lost when run against john kerry and even john mc cain...he barely beat out pat buchanan.
gulf war 1 , bush sr. was "invincible", but the economy was bad like it is now (now its worse even), the stock market was higher, unemployment was
lower, we werent looking at paying a 200 billion dollar war bill, etc. So too will right wingers tell you that this bush will win next year....I'll
put my life on it, unless he turns this economy around and gets the market up and makes a few million new jobs in the next year, he's going to suffer
the wrath of the disenfranchised from 2000 (they have a long memory), and the anger of millions across this country who will still be furious about
htis war in iraq. Never discount the power of hate and how it can rally the troops.
Look for the 2004 election to be HUGE and look for anybody but bush to win. There will be many eyes on florida this time as well just waiting for the
first report of disenfranchisement. Remember the million man march (it was actually 800,000 marchers, played down to 400,000 by "official"
estimators) and see the protests ongoing now? Those crowds number in the MILLIONS, while the pro war crowds only ever number maximum of 1,000 or
so...and the pro war rallies are always funded.
I'm telling you, I already know rally organizers have plans in place to bus people in from outlying communities to vote and they are bringing in
their own lawyers to oversee how it's handled. It's very organized, with a very real goal in mind- the ouster of bush.
Six months after this war is over, those bush poll numbers are going to plummet again..he was at 37% once!...before war, that is, so he may try to
involve us in one war after the next in an attempt to retain his job. In that case it's already decided that impeachment proceedings will be
initiated to tie him up.
You saw it back in 1991 when the 1st bush was kicked out after everybody said he was a lock. You're going to see it again...and you dont have to be
ed dames to see that coming...