It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xavi1000
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Command and Control centers are legitimate targets in that type of action...
Presidential compounds are full of women, children ,servants...
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by xavi1000
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Command and Control centers are legitimate targets in that type of action...
Presidential compounds are full of women, children ,servants...
Isn't the modern world wonderful?
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by boondock-saint
That's just not so Boon.
Are you seriously trying to say that nations the likes of Russia and China, well aware of current events transpiring in N. Africa would send their representatives to the UN only to be confused as to the issues being discussed?
Not a snowballs chance mate.
Everything is discussed beforehand. Presentations are presented, speeches are spoken, and motions are tabled. *Then* the members get to vote or veto.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by spikey
I think you'll find it was Gaddafi who 'started it' when he ordered the slaughter of peaceful protesters.
and I think you'll find that the CIA, US State Dept
and George Soros started it by training the protesters
and inciting them to protest and giving them the means.
There is no good guy here. Gadhaffi is not the good guy
and neither is the CIA for instigating a national uprising.
The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.
Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
The President shall not be deemed to require the authorization of the Congress to make available to the Security Council on its call in order to take action under article 42 of said Charter and pursuant to such special agreement or agreements the armed forces, facilities, or assistance provided for therein
All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security. Such agreement or agreements shall govern the numbers and types of forces, their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of the facilities and assistance to be provided. The agreement or agreements shall be negotiated as soon as possible on the initiative of the Security Council. They shall be concluded between the Security Council and Members or between the Security Council and groups of Members and shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.
The US gets less than 2% of it's oil from Libya. That is not enough to go to war in Libya.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
but no, some cannot comprehend that the
US would lie to bomb or invade another
country.
Originally posted by xavi1000
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Command and Control centers are legitimate targets in that type of action...
Presidential compounds are full of women, children ,servants...edit on 22-3-2011 by xavi1000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SLAYER69
And some cannot comprehend that Libya's massacre of their own people needed to be stopped.
Originally posted by spikey
Once the country is 'secured', a lot more than 2% is for the taking.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by SLAYER69
while they let similar massacres in Bahrain and Yemen go on un challenged, arn't we standing by there and watching innocents get killed by their leaders?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
And some cannot comprehend that Libya's massacre of their own people needed to be stopped.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by spikey
Once the country is 'secured', a lot more than 2% is for the taking.
it is not ours to take.
that is stealing
at the cost of human lives
Originally posted by spikey
Come now Boon...you know what i'm saying.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Why call for a ceasefire now?
WHERE THE HELL WERE THEY WHEN the libyans were ruthlessly EXTERMINATED by the CCP's buddy Gaddafi????!!!
Oh wait...birds of a feather flock together. These 2 govs had never CARED about humanity, except for their own rule. TianAnMen massacres must had been lost to their memory.
Perhaps it is time for the chinese masses to stage an immediate uprising? Need no further evidence on how the illegitimate CCP ruler intends to rule china with bullets, paid off the backs of the our fellow chinese brothers and sisters!!!
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Why call for a ceasefire now?
WHERE THE HELL WERE THEY WHEN the libyans were ruthlessly EXTERMINATED by the CCP's buddy Gaddafi????!!!
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by boondock-saint
Hey boondock we know what we've done.
We get it thrown in our faces many times here at ATS.
Thanks for posting the obvious.
Now can we get back to what is presently going on in Libya and not 1991 or 2003 but 2011?