It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ganjoa
C'mon guys - what do you expect - after all the Nobel prizes are an endowment from the inventor of dynamite and maker of weapons propellants. Giving the peace prize is just great advertising. And when the shooting starts, arms and munitions makers hear the definitive CA-CHING of their cash registers. Irony, that's the ticket!
ganjoa
Originally posted by Krzyzmo
This years nominee's for the Peace Prize
Joseph Stalin: for his peace work in population control.
Bernie Madoff: for his lifelong work in economics.
Al Gore: because he believes he deserves another one
BP: for their environmental contribution
Nancy Pelosi: if Al gets another one, then I want one.
Originally posted by jude11
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
I never understood why he was awarded the thing in the first place. And I was on the Obama bandwagon for awhile there. Not so much anymore. Even before the Libya action.
From what I remember, and please correct me if I am wrong, he got in office and then got the prize. Almost like it came with the appointment.
Am I right on this?
Doesn't really matter about the chain of events. The fact is that he brings the prize to a new low that completely negates the intended purpose. Not that he was the only one but this was embarrassing even for him.edit on 22-3-2011 by jude11 because: edit
Originally posted by Krzyzmo
This years nominee's for the Peace Prize
Joseph Stalin: for his peace work in population control.
Bernie Madoff: for his lifelong work in economics.
Al Gore: because he believes he deserves another one
BP: for their environmental contribution
Nancy Pelosi: if Al gets another one, then I want one.
Originally posted by SalemsLot
reply to post by jude11
The Nobel Archives states that Obama won the Peace prize specifically for:
"his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."
Originally posted by croweboy
reply to post by Shirak
Just to play Devil's Advocate to your Devil's Advocate. Obama Did not consult Congress, a constitutional requirement for US involvement in a war. Bush Junior took us into Iraq under the same premise. He was excoriated by every leftist organization known to man, for doing the exact thing Nobel Laureate Obama did, only Junior stayed within the confines of the Constitution. Obama was given the NPP under the pre-tense that he was an erudite peace loving individual. Not only did he not seek a peaceful solution to the Libya situation his first option was war, forgetting the fact that he sidestepped the constitution.
He should have the NPP rescinded. There should be more leftist nuts questioning the NPP panels sincerity. Obama is a war-monger, likely a bid to claim the White House in 2012. What is happening here is the hypocrisy of Leftist Nuts and the NPP panel being exposed.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by SalemsLot
reply to post by jude11
The Nobel Archives states that Obama won the Peace prize specifically for:
"his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."
Which obama had done nothing to merit since he wasn't even in office long enough (days? weeks?) to have contributed "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples".
And then it has turned out instead that obama has done quite the opposite - as someone else pointed out: fired off more cruise missiles than all other NPP winners combined.
Yes oil is a consideration but dealing with a democratic society is always easier than making dark deals with a dictator.