The first video is an excerpt of an interview with 9/11 survivor Paul Lemos. It was extracted from Release 25 (42A0106-G25D16). Mr. Lemos describes
what he believes are bombs exploding at the World Trade Center, well below the area where the airplane impacted the building. Interestingly, he refers
to an architect "they [the authorities?] pulled in" who explained to Mr. Lemos that it wasn't explosions he was seeing.
"Boom boom boom boom, like twenty straight hits" It sounds like at one point Mr Lemos talks to an architect or someone in authority who says it was
not explosions this is at 1,03 on the shorter video.
Originally posted by samkent
The who and how would be required.
Neither of which have been shown to exist outside of conspiracy websites.
Neither has anyone bothered to look into it... outside of conspiracy websites. Well, that's not true either, because there have been hundreds of
physical conferences and other organized discussions, debates, meetings, etc. involving the whole spectrum of private citizens, politicians and
military veterans. When criminal investigators don't investigate, there tends to be no criminal charges pressed.
I was just commenting in another thread, that this information is finally being pieced together by researchers.
Check out this video and you'll see what ammo we already have for issuing subpoenas and/or indictments in a legal hearing:
And then this is the thread I'm referring to, with more to think about:
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.