It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I clarified the definitions of meltdown and partial meltdown for you in my post before yours and even cited a source. I suggest you review my post again. While you're not completely wrong, you're not completely right either.
Originally posted by richaado
See! I don't know what a 'meltdown' means.
...
Am I wrong? Please educate me if I am.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I clarified the definitions of meltdown and partial meltdown for you in my post before yours and even cited a source. I suggest you review my post again. While you're not completely wrong, you're not completely right either.
Originally posted by richaado
See! I don't know what a 'meltdown' means.
...
Am I wrong? Please educate me if I am.
Originally posted by extmai
reply to post by Heyyo_yoyo
Great people, great culture. Here in the western society, most of the people would just run away!
Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
you are trying very hard to belittle their actions in as a polite way as possible. Thats sad even though you'll be fast to disagree.
You talk like you are an expert, and know the reason behind their actions, but you clearly don't.
"They see themselves as failures", that right there renders your post invalid, because these men are simply enginners, if they had any power that rose above the executives that run the show, then I see how the "failure" arguement might be taken seriously.
Your post reeks of stored jealously.
"most of the workers chose to stay because if they had failed and lived while others died, they most likely would have committed suicide. To them, there was no other choice....die with failure or die with honor"
----Yeah I would too. I don't think you accounted for the severity of this situation. It's a nuclear power plant for god's sake. It changes the whole ball game. It's not some hold up at a bank, where you as a security quard must do your duty. I like how you "know" the mentality of everyone of these men.
"They see themselves as failures, trying to make it right"
----I think you read too many post WW2 articles regarding Japanese culture. First they didn't cause this. I don't see how they would think of themselves as failures. An earthquake, and a tsunami caused it. They are enginners,soldiers, workers etc trained to run the plant. They are not executives who may or may not have skipped out on safety precautions. They are also valunteers.Your comment made no sense at all.
There is no failure in the ordeal these men are in. They are going beyond their duty. There job title does not constitute staying in a place that might get them killed through an explosion, or health effects in the near future.
The last I heard they were rotating workers out to limit their total allowable annual dosage of 250 millisieverts, which would be 37 minutes at 400 mSv per hour.
Originally posted by richierich931
"Around Fukushima Daiichi Station they measured 400 millisieverts – that’s per hour. We get radiation from outer space. But that’s one millisievert per year. A year has 365 days, a day has 24 hours; multiply 365 by 24, you get 8760. Multiply the 400 millisieverts by that, you get 3,500,000 the normal dose. You call that safe? And what media have reported this? None."
Symptoms of acute radiation (within one day):[16]
* 0 – 0.25 Sv (0 – 250 mSv): None (no symptoms)
The so-called Fukushima 50, the group of around 300 technicians, soldiers and firemen who work in shifts of 50, have been exposed repeatedly to dangerously high radioactive levels as they attempt to avert a nuclear disaster.
The mother of one of the men has admitted that the group have discussed their situation and have accepted that death is a strong possibility.
“My son and his colleagues have discussed it at length and they have committed themselves to die if necessary in the long-term.”