It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He was sent to the world my friend... to set an example and leave the way open to those who choose the narrow path...
Btw its hard to respond to two of your posts at once...
I'm sure what Jesus actually preached was nice and all but from what I'm reading here from Mr KJV, he is not exactly making me warm and furry inside.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
If you followed Jesus's teachings in these passages, you would end up in hell when you died just like the rich man in Luke 16.
Originally posted by Cor Leonis
reply to post by boncho
God is Spirit and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth. A person must be born again of the spirit of God of which was lost in the Garden of Eden events. Man is a two part being of body and soul. Man must become a three part being of body, soul and spirit.
Any activity that does not bring God honor and glory is not light but darkness. Jesus Christ payed for the sins of the world by the shedding of his own pure blood so that even though our own righteousness is as filthy rags. Jesus Christ righteousness makes us white as snow.
"Thats a question thats been on my mind for a long time. I know it wasn't solely directed at me, however it is an intriguing subject. I've read that He made trips to the east in India or Tibet, or that He was just working as a carpenter with His father. There is much to be speculated on the life of Jesus since there are no records of His life other than His childhood. "
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Tayesin
the actual text there is:
So God 430 created 1254 man 120 in his [own] image 6754, in the image 6754 of God 430 created 1254 he him; male 2145 and female 5347 created 1254 he them.
every word with a number after it, was in the original hebrew. every word without a number, was not in the original hebrew. therefore, the verse said:
Elohim created adam image, image Elohim created; male female created.
the words "he, him" "he them" "in his own" were not in the original hebrew,
those were added by translators. furthermore, "Elohim" and "Adam" were both plural words.
so essentially the verse said: The gods created copies of themselves known as the adamic race, male and female. Some of the god templates from which the adamic race were copied, were female, which suggests that some of the gods were female. because in this verse, there's no gender identity for the gods, it's used in a general sense for both genders and the god word used is plural.edit on 23-3-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2012king
If the Greek gods are mentioned in the bible, and are now discounted as mythology, and they are also interpreted as sons of God (the giants in genesis 6) surely that would also make the God of the bible a myth...
Originally posted by KJV1611
The 4 different accounts come from 4 different writers, easy enough right? To top it off, these four never got together and made sure their stories match.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Criminals have to make their stories match.
Judging by this, I will say that you admit that the Bible is the word of man, not the word of God.
Originally posted by KJV1611
reply to post by Tayesin
Yeah but...your whole posted is based on your own self conceived assumptions.
I deal only with the Bible is this thread man, if you want to debate mystical stuff, make your own thread.
And why say ye our emotions are so small and tiny in the universe? Do you see any trees crying or animals singing together? Without our emotions we would be no better than a rock. Which God could also make shout and sing if he wanted too.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Tayesin
the biblical example isn't a skeleton if you read it in the original hebrew. a lot of detail is hidden, obfuscated, misconstrued and misunderstood, because of the translations into greek, latin, german and english. most who criticize it, do so from their own paradigm, which carries with it the criticisms of the schools of thought on the subject, but not the actual material.
here's something you might find interesting:
did you know Enki may very well be identified as Jehovah in the original hebrew? I know sitchin thought he was Yahweh, but not Jehovah. I believe he is wrong. Jehovah is Yahweh. Enki's akkadian title of EA, is pronounced AYAH.
HAYAH is the root from which Jehovah derives. the H was the hebrew pronunciation of A in the word. you can hear it here: (see the little pronunciation player on the right, top)
www.blueletterbible.org...
if you read the description of hayah on that page, you might also notice that it seems to suggest the same concept as I AM I AM. the english text describes "I am that I am," incorrectly, as the word "that" was not in the original. The original was I AM I AM. Another way to say it might be, TO BE TO BE,
or IS IS, denoting a state of perpetual existence, et.al, omnipresence.
edit on 23-3-2011 by undo because: (no reason given)