It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChaosComplex
reply to post by Jim Scott
And what if the one true God is one that doesn't demand unquestioning worship? What single piece of evidence shows which version of God is correct?
Sure, because the word for God in Genesis is Elohim, which is plural. Eloi is singular. Elohim is more than one. The Torah states that God is plural in its language. The Trinity comes into play when you see it says God made man in His image. It does not say images.
Originally posted by DrCarter
reply to post by Jim Scott
No problem Jim, great reply. I agree we didn't evolve from monkeys, just throwing the AA thing out as a possible topic of debate. You have proved my only point which is we can all have a discussion without attacking over differences of opinion.
Originally posted by virraszto
reply to post by Jim Scott
Sure, because the word for God in Genesis is Elohim, which is plural. Eloi is singular. Elohim is more than one. The Torah states that God is plural in its language. The Trinity comes into play when you see it says God made man in His image. It does not say images.
And you don't think that could in any way mean Gods.
Let us (Gods) make man in our (Gods) own image.
You wouldn't say, Let us humans make man in our own images, would you?
Originally posted by ChaosComplex
Could it be possible that more than one holy text was written as a factual account of the times? Is it possible that "God" sent many messengers to Earth, and the teachings, stories, morals, etc were all from the same place, only the fine details were slightly twisted simply due to interpretation? All of this resulting in slightly different stories?
Originally posted by ChaosComplex
reply to post by Jim Scott
No double negative there. Re-worded and emphasized:
What if the
://only true God//:
is one who
://does not demand//:
to be
://worshiped without question//:.
Originally posted by InnerstellarOne
reply to post by ChaosComplex
its no surprise, Satan and his angels fell from heaven to the earth, So its no common misconseption people have the idea of space people with wings that were flying and offered wisdom and knowledge to mankind.
you got to remember satan isnt a fictional sub conciouss diety, He is real, And he HATES MAN with a burning evil passion, He comes to steal kill and to destroy
Originally posted by ChaosComplex
reply to post by InnerstellarOne
If they "fell" to Earth, what made this happen? Why the fall from high in the sky? Is heaven a physical place? If heaven is a place only able to be experienced after death, then it must exist in a way that we can't understand yet. That still doesn't explain how "beings" can "fall" to Earth from a place that doesn't even exist on the same plane.
So following that logic, would it be safe to postulate that to know God, one must first understand science?
Originally posted by ChaosComplex
There had to be some process in the creation of the universe. I mean no matter how powerful, there is no way that every molecule and every atom were created instantaneously and simultaneously. That process is what we would call Science.
It may be science FAAARRR more complicated than we understand, but science either way.edit on 3/20/2011 by ChaosComplex because: (no reason given)