It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by Wademus
Honestly, if you'd done research on evolution, you would understand the various levels of strata and how fossils literally couldn't have gotten to where they were in a period afterward. Also, fossilization is a very VERY rare process, happening sometimes only a few times over a million years, and that's a lot of time! Since under the current theory, evolutionary traits change every 90,000 generations or so (might be a different number, heard it in biological anthropology class), that means that depending on the creature, you have literally thousands of traits changing every million years, multiply that into the number of billion years that life has existed on Earth and you get a decent idea of how things may have changed into what they are today.
You won't find every transitional species also because many times the branching species lived alongside the species that it originated from for a long time, or all of the one died.
Many human ancestors are known about because creatures killed us and our bones fell into an area far more prone to fossilization. This is not even related to religion. It is simply a scientific observation of how the rocks could have formed from organic matter, and we use many methods of the breakdown of radioactive isotopes in order to determine a general age at which something might be.
Religion can say what it wants, but evolution is certainly real.
That's nice, but I don't care about India. I care about my own religion. And it says in plain simple words, God created man in his image, and then he created THEM male and female. Humanity is in and of itself male and female.
Originally posted by CLINTPOST
reply to post by ChaosComplex
[mo
Someone may have already stated this, but when it is talking about kinds it is referring to horses only have children that are horses. Humans only have humans for children. They don't give birth to apes, etc... A good site that helped me with understanding creation science is www.icr.org, it really proved to me the Bible is true and that evolution, macro evolution, does not happen in life/nature and is a man made concept. It's a lie. It also helps that I know some of the scientists personally that worked for ICR, Dr. John Baumgardner and Steve Austin.
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by CLINTPOST
reply to post by ChaosComplex
[mo
Someone may have already stated this, but when it is talking about kinds it is referring to horses only have children that are horses. Humans only have humans for children. They don't give birth to apes, etc... A good site that helped me with understanding creation science is www.icr.org, it really proved to me the Bible is true and that evolution, macro evolution, does not happen in life/nature and is a man made concept. It's a lie. It also helps that I know some of the scientists personally that worked for ICR, Dr. John Baumgardner and Steve Austin.
Not to sound condescending, but no person in their right mind would believe that any creature spontaneously gives birth to a new species. These changes were EXTREMELY gradual. It took humans around 20 million years or so to become what we are from the common ancestor we share with chimps and bonobos. Chimps share many attributes with us, including tool usage. Bonobos share our social tendencies. We share similar skeletal structures with WHALES for crying out loud. Why would God create all of these similarities that can be explained by super gradual change? To trick us, or to make us question our faith and see who stays steadfast?
Originally posted by tyranny22
reply to post by Akragon
I disagree. I think the entire thing is important. New Testament. Old Testament. Big Bang Theory. Evolution.
Read it all. Decide for yourself. And for the love of (whatever you believe) don't bash other people's beliefs.
I think there's truth in all of it. But, there's also a lot of influence, too.
Decide for yourself what you should weed out and what to take to heart and live by.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by ButterCookie
Actually we are not. Stars are made of hydrogen and helium you see. And we are neither plasma nor nuclear fusion.
What's so special about stars? They're not the coolest things out there. marveling at the fire is lazy and useless. Turn the fire into an engine and make things, now there's something cool.
Besides, you are adding your own terms to it. In fact, the bible states much later that stars and people are made of different things.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by ButterCookie
I do. I still believe in God. I'm a solidarity nut a lot of the time.
Sorry, you're wrong. The only reason I am with God is because there is no one else as good and loyal as he. I couldn't give a damn if he loved me or not or was with me or not. I love him because of who he is.
Originally posted by CLINTPOST
reply to post by Varemia
Why can't one consider that God, being Creator of all things, could use the similar features in his designs of life? We do the same thing with cars, they may all look slightly different, but they are still cars. Might be a weak example, but God does want us to reason with him, not just to believe blindly. Pray about it, ask in Christ name that he reveal truth to you and believe that he will if he's there.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by Wademus
Imagine having 10 million drops of water that changed chemical content constantly. Now imagine if you could only preserve 5 drops out of those 10 million. Will you see the transitions from chemical to chemical? Now do this 10 million more times. You will have only 25 drops after 50 million changes, 50 drops after 100 million changes. That's like trying to see a comic on the newspaper by choosing 3 tiny dots. You won't see the whole picture, but you'll know that the picture is there.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by Wademus
That's because the "distinct" species are not distinct at all. We do see only some changes in certain fossils while others have greater changes.
There is no jump from one identified species to another. It is a gradual change in which every successive species cannot even technically be defined as a species because we cannot know whether the two could reproduce with viable offspring (the definition of a species).
I already told you the reason why you don't see many transitional species. Fossilization does not happen to everybody. Go ahead, try to find a way to fossilize yourself easily in nature. It's not easy.