It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Twitter going NUTS - Says Gaddafi's son was killed!

page: 2
2
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:30 PM
link   
The Sword is right, shouldn't we have learned from the last time the US did something like that. Certainly it hasn't happened again. That is what is best not the slaughter of innocents to save money. I am certain that at least the vast majority on ATS where opposed to the situation to begin with much less using such a tactic. A simpler and more precise attack, as it has no become necessary, such as armed drones are even covert sniping missions would achieve the same goal with far less loss of innocent life.




posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:31 PM
link   
You know whats really shocking? That 50 Cent performed a private concert for the Gaddafi family. Oh well, Gaddafi is just going crazy, he needs to relax, he used to be a good leader but then the power got to his head, that's what happens when you mix power and greed with human nature, you get chaos and turmoil! ahhh



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:32 PM
link   
And I don't understand his virgin women guard, that's weird lol



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrWendal
I dont know why anyone would be shocked by this news. This is Standard Operating Procedure for Coalition forces. We always kill the whole family and make sure that relatives will never rise to power. Did we not kill Saddam and his sons as well?


I had NOTHING to do with any killing the U.S. Corporation of America has done, nor never will !!!



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:38 PM
link   


if i was a parent...) and my kid got killed then i would be sending off nukes anytime now
reply to post by loagun
 


That's why i am doubting the fact that his son died, Gaddafi is crazy he would definitely use everything he has to launch a full offensive on the rebels despite western pressure



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Caji316
 


Caji I am guessing military, I do not think they where saying so, as it would imply that all soldiers regardless of country are determined guilty because of the other nations actions. I am hopeful that that is not the case here. I was a US soldier and never agreed with any of our current wars, which is why I am now a civilian again.
edit on 20-3-2011 by DrCarter because: correction

edit on 20-3-2011 by DrCarter because: Misspoke



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by minkey53
 


A nuke on Tripoli would kill millions of innocent people in addition to Quaddafi.

So much for common sense on this site. I don't understand how anyone could be a war troll?



Somebody else with no sense of humour, oh dear!




posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by watchitburn
reply to post by minkey53
 


We could save a whole lot more tax payer dollars by not having anything to do with this whole mess.

And the only one that Gadaffi is a threat to is the oil companies.



Just been reading on the MSM that BP are going to start drilling for OIL now in Libyan waters.

Something stinks here!



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:47 PM
link   
Can't we just send in an SAS Sniper and one bullet later, madman is a gonna?

That might save lots of lives!



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by minkey53
Just been reading on the MSM that BP are going to start drilling for OIL now in Libyan waters.
Something stinks here!

dude, that is old news.
BP has 3 exploratory tracts in Libya already.
Matter of fact, BP Personnel was some of
the 150 that was choppered out by the SAS
before the attacks started. They were already there.
One of those tracts is just off the coast of
Bengazhi.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:50 PM
link   
good gosh at the disinfo in this thread.
so many I am not even about to
start fixing them. maybe ya'll should
take some snake bite anti-dote
instead of Potassiun Iodide.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:52 PM
link   
Correct me if I am mistaken, but back in 1986 didn't we kill some of his family members when the F-111s hit his compound? I'm not sure which, if any, WMDs this cat is holding, but it would not surprise me if he used them once his back is against the wall.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:52 PM
link   
Sounds like someone in Libya wants this escalated.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 08:52 PM
link   
they dont care that this bombing campaign will cost us the taxpayers tons of money because the corporations are gonna bank off the mess...i dont see why it has to be that every conflict they the coalition starts anyway feels they need to butt in. why is it ok for them to do it but if other countries were to butt in on what they are doing in iraq and other things they would be seen as terroristic threats. its all a joke anymore...
edit on 20-3-2011 by gdaub23 because: corrections



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 09:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by minkey53
I wouldn't make a very good President and here's why!

Ghadaffi and his cronies along with (according to the MSM) over a million supporters of his in Tripoli would be taken out with something big in one go.

They will continue to cause trouble and cost the tax payer billions whilst alive.

Maybe even terrorist attacks in other countries.

So to do us all a favour and get it over and done with, one nuke on Tripoli.

You know it makes sense!



That is the worst idea I have ever heard... You are right, you would be terrible as president... Nuking another country would only piss off other countries who have nukes... This could very well start WW3..... Pissing off other nuclear powers.... Having nukes launched back at us and we fire back with nukes of our own....

Just... Hell no... worst idea ever.... There is a saying that the best deterrent for nuclear war is the possession of nuclear weapons... In other words, the fact that launching nukes would piss off other nuclear powers and spark a nuclear war, is what is keeping us from launching nukes....

You launch a nuke, You risk pissing off countires such as India, China, Russia, France, Isreal, The UK.

Then you have other countries that are close to or suspected of having them already such as North Korea, Iran, Syria and Pakistan.

You launch a nuke.... and you start world war 3.... And you know what they say.... " I can't tell you what world war 3 will be like... But I can tell you what WW4 will be like. We will be fighting with sticks and stones."

You know your idea makes no sense at all.
edit on 20-3-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   
There does seem to be quite the controversy over both the plane crash (appears to be bunk) and Ghadaffis sons death. I did however find what is supposed to be a breaking news site on Libya.

www.libyafeb17.com...



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   
reply to post by IamAbeliever
 


killed a daughter or she was a step daughter, when regan sent him a hello missle
to his little tent.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by hounddoghowlie
 


Yes, I do think it was a step-daughter. Thank you.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Breaking on CNN...

Coalition targets Gadhafi compound


Asked about reports of smoke rising from the area of Gadhafi's palace, Gortney said, "We are not targeting his residence."



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
Is This still 'Rumor' or has there been some kind of conformation of his death?

Either way this will not end well.. even if this is a 'Short Mission' even if this is over quick.. the ramifications last far longer then that




top topics



 
2
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join