It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NO radiation in USA

page: 2
3
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:17 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


I take it that the "your govt rarely lies to you these days" conspiracy theory is the one you are not familiar with?

The truth hurts man. The truth hurts.




posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by routerboy
Typical response, "a sheep". Lets face it, there's no radiation - look on radiationnetwork.com - Dangerous levels of radiation? I think not!

The government will not lie to you on this one - too many people can check if they are lying. The real truth is, the government very rarely lies to it's citizens these days because they will be too easily caught out. We're living in great times at the minute.
edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)


You are joking?
The government, your's, mine, the world over lie every time they open their mouths. Even when evidence proves they have lied, they deny it and are not held accountable. They'll just spin their way out or flat-out ignore the issue hoping it'll go away.

Personally, I trust nothing my government tells me as fact. If they told me the sun was shining I'd feel obliged to stick my head out the window to check myself!


edit on 20-3-2011 by Britguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by routerboy
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


I take it that the "your govt rarely lies to you these days" conspiracy theory is the one you are not familiar with?

The truth hurts man. The truth hurts.


Ok I get it, you're just poking us for fun.

You had me there, nice work. Congrats.

I totally thought you were serious for a minute. Now I know you are just throwing out every form of blasphemy you can find. Oh well. Enjoy.

When you provide evidence or answer even 2-3 of the questions about MOX fuel or cesium or the amount of fuel in each reactor, maybe I will come back and give you the time of day.

Thanks anyways.

edit on 20-3-2011 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Well, the idea that the government are there to actually help you is an unpopular one here, due to all the conspiracy nuts here... If there was no government you probably would have a life expectancy of about 32 years. Fact.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by routerboy
Well, the idea that the government are there to actually help you is an unpopular one here, due to all the conspiracy nuts here... If there was no government you probably would have a life expectancy of about 32 years. Fact.


FACT!! Oh how funny.


Sorry but people lived for more than 32 years before the USA came to be.

Good try though.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Britguy
 


That's very true.

Mind, the media make the Govt look like the truthfulest person in truthful land on truth day ...

The Govt are simply stupid and incompetent. The media are manipulative and evil. They report what they want you to believe. Facts are like small dead slugs - not worthy of even considering. Just so long as the public are scared. That is all that matters!



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
reply to post by chocise
 


Here's another source for you then.


The Chernobyl nuclear disaster may have caused the deaths of 1000 children across England and Wales, as rain from contaminated clouds fell on parts of England and Wales, new research suggests.

Twenty years after the disaster, epidemiologist John Urquhart told the Nuclear Free Local Authorities conference in London on Thursday that he had found an "almost perfect correlation" between areas where rain from radioactive clouds fell, and an 11% increase in infant deaths.

Chernobyl linked to British children's deaths



Sorry m8, but that is 110% total BS.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by chocise

Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
reply to post by chocise
 


Here's another source for you then.


The Chernobyl nuclear disaster may have caused the deaths of 1000 children across England and Wales, as rain from contaminated clouds fell on parts of England and Wales, new research suggests.

Twenty years after the disaster, epidemiologist John Urquhart told the Nuclear Free Local Authorities conference in London on Thursday that he had found an "almost perfect correlation" between areas where rain from radioactive clouds fell, and an 11% increase in infant deaths.

Chernobyl linked to British children's deaths



Sorry m8, but that is 110% total BS.


Sorry m8, unless you can disprove it with some kind of linked article its just your opinion.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Chocise
 


Absolutely! I can't believe people are STILL passing off this tripe as gospel. Even if it were true it would have NOTHING to do with the current situation today, considering the current situation isn't even that bad.
edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by routerboy
reply to post by Concise
 


Absolutely! I can't believe people are STILL passing off this tripe as gospel. Even if it were true it would have NOTHING to do with the current situation today, considering the current situation isn't even that bad.
edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)


The situation is we have had a radioactive plum carried over the USA and Canada and we have been given 0 info on the isotopes contained within it. Maybe if you learned how dangerous a few of those isotopes are you would be a little more worried.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:41 PM
link   
There is ZERO to worry about. My goodness, have people in Tokyo even started coughing yet?? NOPE!!!



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   
wow, naive and ignorant all at the same time op


The same government that gave its service members Tuskegee syphilis experiment?

The same government that '___' was used by the CIA on studies?


This same government is stating that their is nothing to worry about


not sure about you, but for me and my family i do not get sucked into such propanda with out using my cranium and common sense level abit



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreeSpeaker

Originally posted by chocise

Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
reply to post by chocise
 


Here's another source for you then.


The Chernobyl nuclear disaster may have caused the deaths of 1000 children across England and Wales, as rain from contaminated clouds fell on parts of England and Wales, new research suggests.

Twenty years after the disaster, epidemiologist John Urquhart told the Nuclear Free Local Authorities conference in London on Thursday that he had found an "almost perfect correlation" between areas where rain from radioactive clouds fell, and an 11% increase in infant deaths.

Chernobyl linked to British children's deaths



Sorry m8, but that is 110% total BS.


Sorry m8, unless you can disprove it with some kind of linked article its just your opinion.


John Urquhart is entitled to his opinion. But it's still BS. He has no evidence to support his contention. He just misuses and misinterprets data to suit his own agenda. But there are always people who are willing to believe what they want to believe....



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by routerboy
There is ZERO to worry about. My goodness, have people in Tokyo even started coughing yet?? NOPE!!!


I wish I could get someone fro Tokyo to send you a glass of water and some vegatebles. Bet you wouldn't drink the water or eat the veggies.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by FreeSpeaker
 


There is no evidence that the radiation released from Fukushima is even harmful in the slightest. There's NO evidence what-so-ever of any harmful effects as yet.

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 02:02 PM
link   
You don't even understand how radiation affects the human body do you?

I knew I shouldn't come back, but this is too easy.

Look, radiation takes TIME to build up. That's why people were rotated out at Chernobyl. Do some research and stop spouting your beliefs and dressing them up as facts. At least say "maybe, potentially, what if, it could be that, etc etc" to be honest with your assessments. Instead you get your opinion and assume it's 100% without even the slightest smidgen of evidence in favor of it.

Getting X amount of radiation may not seem bad today, but after continual exposure for long durations of time, your limitations begin to be exceeded. Hence Chernobyl rotation theory.

Do at least basic research before you come play here, please.

Radiation Sickness- Exposure Levels Wiki

Annual limit on intake (ALI) is the derived limit for the amount of radioactive material taken into the body of an adult worker by inhalation or ingestion in a year. ALI is the intake of a given radionuclide in a year that would result in: a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.05 Sv (5 rems) for a "reference human body", or a committed dose equivalent of 0.5 Sv (50 rems) to any individual organ or tissue, whatever dose is the smaller



Longer term exposure to radiation, at doses less than that which produces serious radiation sickness, can induce cancer as cell-cycle genes are mutated. The probability cancer will develop is a function of radiation dose. In radiation-induced cancer the disease, the speed at which the condition advances, the prognosis, the degree of pain, and every other feature of the disease are not functions of the radiation dose to which the person is exposed.


Your welcome for actually taking the time to educate you on the basics.

Too bad your precious Govt failed to educate you about even BASIC science.
Thankfully you have places like this where you can actually correspond with half-way decent people and get second and third opinions and sometimes , ACTUAL VERIFIED FACTS, like those I just linked above.

Thus proving your entire OP wrong start to finish. Sure the radiation dose is safe for one hour. But for weeks or months without any end in sight? Yeah, your gonna be growing cancer cells most likely....

Your Welcome.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by routerboy
reply to post by FreeSpeaker
 


There is no evidence that the radiation released from Fukushima is even harmful in the slightest. There's NO evidence what-so-ever of any harmful effects as yet.

edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)


The differnence between the two of us is i'm presenting facts and your presenting your opinion. I've listed articles that show the UK was more severly damaged than the government lets on. Now we have another event and we are being told everything is OK, when history show us they said the same thing about the radiation from chernobyl.

There is ZERO info either way how dangerous the plum was and until we get that info I will not believe the official "nothing to see here" from the gov.

History is a great teacher and it often repeats itself.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Essan
 


No Ill effects? tell that to 3 people of my extended family who all lost 2 unborn babies each in Wales and 2 have since died from cancer and the other is living with it.
Unfortunately they lived on sheep farms but ate their local grown produce BEFORE we were told the radiation was a problem in the hills when the rain came



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


And is there any significant amounts in the USA? Nope. So you can take you little post to the Japanese because it doesn't matter - I'll help you read the title of this thread. No. Radiation. in. USA.
edit on 20-3-2011 by routerboy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by squizzy
reply to post by Essan
 


No Ill effects? tell that to 3 people of my extended family who all lost 2 unborn babies each in Wales and 2 have since died from cancer and the other is living with it.
Unfortunately they lived on sheep farms but ate their local grown produce BEFORE we were told the radiation was a problem in the hills when the rain came


Sorry to hear about that squizzy. Thank you for the confirmation that the UK is still radiated.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join