It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
I heard a rumor on the news last night that the Arab league were only supporting the strikes on Libya if the West agreed to turn a blind eye to the protests in Bahrain, Saudi and other oil producing nations. Just a rumor, but you could see it happening.
Originally posted by blackcat99
The Arab league leader is now saying he was misquoted earlier on and the comments were translated incorrectly on Sky news live at the moment
Originally posted by TriForce
The only reason that the west is going into Libya, is because Kadaffi has lost control of the situation and the west wants to be there to protect their interests, just in case Kadaffis is beaten.
They want to have a say so on who steps into the power vacuum.
Originally posted by Ferris.Bueller.II
This is what Obama gets for attacking a non-threatening sovereign nation with only a ruling from the U.N. which isn't even worth the toilet paper it's written on. Well, looks like he now has his own little oil war on his resume. Any predictions when our ground forces are going to be deployed, and the first U.S. bases pop up in Libya?
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Honestly, I don't think anyone should be meddling in Libya's business, aside from possibly providing arms to those that have none. It's a freaking civil war...Imagine if we were to have another civil war here in the U.S. and the UN intervened....you had better hope you are fighting on the side that the UN backs.
Originally posted by notsofunnyguy
reply to post by jibeho
Supporting role? We've fired 122 of the 124 Tomahawks into Libya. We poured the concrete, put up the beams, and installed the rafters. All the coalition did was stick a couple of shingles on top.
So far, anyway.
Originally posted by blackcat99
The Arab league leader is now saying he was misquoted earlier on and the comments were translated incorrectly on Sky news live at the moment
Originally posted by Aggie Man
What the hell did the Arab League think a "no-fly-zone" consist of, shaking our finger at Gadaffi and telling him to pretty please promise to keep his jets on the ground?
Earlier in the day, the Arab League criticised the military action, with the group's chief speaking out just a week after urging the United Nations to operate a no-fly zone on the North African state.
However, Foreign Secretary William Hague later made it clear he believed the group fully backed the action taken by the coalition.
Arriving at Downing Street for the National Security Council meeting, he confirmed he had spoken to the group's Secretary-General Amr Moussa.
A statement from the Foreign Office supported Mr Hague's comments, saying that they would "continue to work with our Arab partners to enforce the resolution for the good of the Libyan people."
Of the Arab states, only Qatar has openly supported the Western-led campaign and their planes are now moving into position near Libya.
Sky sources confirm the United Arab Emirates is offering help but does not seek to publicise it.