 |
|
Topic started on 21-7-2004 @ 07:14 PM by MacKiller
|
I found these pictues on the net and was curious as to what everyone else thought about them.
Link
The way I look at these things, is sometimes the most incredible, the most bizarre, the most outlandish, tends to be closest to the truth. People who
investigate these things see fakes all of the time. How often do we actually get the real thing, and how would we honestly know if it was the real
thing or not? To be perfectly honest, I don't see all of these 'flaws' you are reporting. Just like I see no big worries regarding chemtrails, or
the hoaxed moon landings.
It's all a matter of perspective. I still stand by them, because there are certain elements that truly stood out to me. I have a camera just like
this, and have recorded people with night vision. No human being would be able to perceive the infrared beam being projected from the camera. The
alien in the photos is clearing shielding his eyes from it. Secondly, you can see the beam reflecting in the alien's eyes. That shouldn't happen
either. Thirdly, the plant does not look copied and pasted to me at all. It's not the same branch, you can see the top left leaf is turned at a
different angle.
Fourthly, the one branch that looks superimposed in the foreground, you can see the same distortion that the camera shows for the entire image on this
branch. I have also noticed such strange images with my own camera. Using night vision distorts any image you pickup, because it is a single beam
being projected from the bottom of the camera. The reason it looks fake is because it is catching the IR directly from the beam. It is brightest and
focused mostly in this area, essentially lighting it up.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 07:20 PM by SpittinCobra
|
Its so hard to tell if pictures are true or not. They look to real to be real.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 07:21 PM by machinegunjordan
|
yea cool pics, they were posted like 10 times but theyre still cool.
external image
i think this is proof aliens excrete liquid waste the same as humans 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 07:47 PM by muckminer
|
I think it sort of looks like Michael Jackson without hair. Disappointing that better quality (larger) images aren't available of the "Alien's
Night Out".
[edit on 7/21/2004 by muckminer]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 07:52 PM by MacKiller
|
Of course, the pictures could be better quality, but there are some other, interesting pictures of these aliens on the website I provided.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 07:54 PM by Jazzerman
|
Its hard to tell if pics are fake, thats for sure! Whether they are real or not they are quite facinating to look at. Im no expert in photography,
so I cannnot offer difinitive proof either way!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 07:54 PM by cyberdude78
|
Hard to tell if there real. I find it hard to believe that with all that technology they would be running around naked for the paparazzi to snap
photos. Unless the tabloids are secretly modeling magizines for aliens 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 08:06 PM by misspickle
|
It is always difficult to tell if they are real or not.
Did anyone see that Mcphreasons tape? Its funny so many people thought it was real- they didnt think to look at the credits and see that it was a
hoax- the funniest bit in the credits is when it comes up with Alien 1, Alien 2, Alien3 etc and who the aliens were played by!
Its a shame people do play hoaxs because then people have a hard time trying to decide whether to believe or not.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 08:38 PM by muckminer
|
Originally posted by MacKiller
Of course, the pictures could be better quality, but there are some other, interesting pictures of these aliens on the website I provided. 
Sorry I didn't see the other images at first - did review the site and saw the other images...I think they are real fake. That said, if I didn't
know better and only saw it on television, I would think the towers falling weren't real...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 08:38 PM by Crovax
|
www.rense.com...
right on that page. someone thinks its fake......
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 08:42 PM by MacKiller
|
Yes someone does think its fake.
A bunch of people do think it is real though, and I am pretty convinced that the person who posted it on the site thinks its real. Why else would he
have a site that says its fake on the page?
Also, look it his/hers response to the page.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2004 @ 08:44 PM by RR
|
Fake but some damn good fakes nonetheless!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 09:29 AM by Peronemlin
|
Why are you so sure they are fake?
I used to believe they were fake to, until I watched them carefully in this thread, and now Iīm not that sure. I see nothing that looks fake.
I think they could be real...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 09:38 AM by devil9t9uk
|
What are the aliens doing?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 10:09 AM by ShadowXIX
|
Is there any video to go with these images or is there just pictures. I know many video cameras come with night-shot now, But was not aware normal
cameras have the same nightvision. Now if I saw these things moving around in a video I would be really impressed. If they are just pictures they
could easily just be alien dummies/ props that were posed for these shots without faking anything in the film. Im not saying this is the case but it
is one easy way it could be done if it was a hoax
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 10:16 AM by Peronemlin
|
I still believe the pics are real, but I have a question:
Why are they naked? Or they arenīt?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 10:21 AM by Kriz_4
|
Well it does say that he was filming with a video camera, so those pictures must be stills. So, he must have video footage, surely he would have
released that too.
That fact is the only thing that tells me it is fake. If I saw the running footage I feel there is a good chance I would believe what I am seeing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 10:29 AM by ShadowXIX
|
Originally posted by Peronemlin
I still believe the pics are real, but I have a question:
Why are they naked? Or they arenīt?

Some people think the Greys are wearing some type of skin tight suit and are not infact running around naked. Something maybe like our space or bio
suits but advanced so much that they look like a second skin perhaps made up of some type of nano technology. I tend to go with that theory more then
that they are always running around naked.
although Greys could be the cosmic flasher  of the univerese who knows
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 11:24 AM by Dawnaj
|
Donīt ask me why but I didnīt think it was possible to sneak that close to Greys without them knowing of your presence, let alone get away with using
recording technology on them.
The site offered an explanation but I donīt quite understand why the alien is looking straight into the camera in the first picture.
And as some already said, it was according to the text supposed to have been shot on video. Well, why not show us the video then? The "beings" are
very slender which I think will rule out a small person in a costume. So either they are dummies/dolls or the real thing.
Offcourse it could also be 3d-animation, didnīt think about that first.
However it really doesnīt look like it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-7-2004 @ 11:41 AM by Zzub
|
These are fake, without question of a doubt.
There was a long thread ages ago which fairly proved them to be fake. I remember pointing out all the flaws.
Very poor attempt, I'm surprised to see them again.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |