It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by TheEasterBunny
Yes it makes them vulnerable to the AGM-88 HARM missile. Using Commander Dani's tactics the vulnerabilities are reduced. Not only is that interesting, but the Tor and Pantisir systems are designed specifically to defeat the HARM systems meaning even if somehow a SAM system was targeted, there would be good chance it would be shot down.
The two aircraft that were downed were downed by a single SA-3 system with a COMPETENT Air defense commander. I believe they fired approximately 2 missiles per plane.
This is 1960's technology. The TorM2 and pantsir systems are much more modern and therefore in the hands of a competent air defense commander will be able to stop most things that you throw at them. This renders the 50 million dollar F22 just shooting blanks.
Watch the TorM2 shoot down incoming missiles:
www.militaryphotos.net...![
During the NATO war campaign the HARMs were very ineffective. Only a confirmed success rate of 3 out of 743 shots made the hit to target. That is extremely poor especially when they were using legacy equipment.edit on 20-3-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)
Lock was obtained and at a distance of 13 km and an altitude of 8 km. Two SA-3 missiles were launched in short succession, with one obtaining a proximity fuse hit, as notified by an automatic radio pinger burst.
Owing to these measures, Dani's unit evaded 23 incoming HARM missiles, all of which impacted off-site with insignificant or zero damages.
An assessment published by the USAF showed that two B-2s armed with precision weaponry can do the job of 75 conventional aircraft.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Just as a reiteration, these are the tracking performance specs of the acquisition radar and electro-optical systems for the Pantsir System:
This system protects the S400 SAM from HARM threats and Hellfire threats. The hellfire has a range of 5 miles, the HARM has a range of 66 miles. When both come close they will be tracked and will be shot down. The apaches wont be able to get close enough to defeat this system and the S400 SAM will have free reign over the skies.
LOL commander Dani shot down 2 US air craft, damaged one and AVOIDED 23 HARMs,with 1960s technology.
Each harm missle costs 870,000 USD, so he wasted 20 Million USD of the USA on missiles, and the $42 million on the F117, and $15 million on the F-16. So for a grand total Commander Dani destroyed $77 million worth of high tech US equipment.
Originally posted by libertytoall
It's actually quite simple.. No 1 vs 1 bulls***.. You send 2 bombers, 10 cruise missiles, and 2 apache's and you can't tell me that site can track that many targets at once..
Time the attack properly with multiple incoming threats(like 10 - 12) and that entire site is "Buh bye.".edit on 21-3-2011 by libertytoall because: (no reason given)
Perhaps if we have a budget to work with ( question for you professional) for both sides or knew how large or small the defending country is?
trying to sell a dozen S-400 missile systems worth $4 billion (Zaman, July 21). The SSM earlier rebuffed the Kremlin’s offer of direct sales, advising Rosoboronexport instead to submit a RfP.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
The Tor-M2 units cost $25 million
The Pantsir System costs $15 million
The S400 System $300 million/unit (I didnt find a cost anywhere but from the quote below).
F22 unit cost: 150 million
AGM-88 HARM unit cost: US$870,000
JDAM: $35,000+ for the GBU-38 $70,000+ for the GBU-31
Tomahawk: $1,066,465
So A mid size country like Iran could get one S400 system and 3 Tors and 3 Pantsirs to guard the prized S400 all for under a billion dollars and then stock up on missiles.
The way I see it, after having read expert analysis: since Iran doesn't have the setup the way I have shown you, they will lose miserably trying to defend against the US. There is no way Iran will win against the US unless or hamper the US efforts unless they upgrade like I said.
China can most certainly have the budget to protect the North Korean peninsula and with these defensive systems.
So if we say $500 million in defense spending per side it can be a fair, interesting fight. There can be various scenarios and combination's budget-wise that can be played out. For instance you could use all that money and buy 500 tomahawks, or buy 2 F22 and a crapload of JDAMs. The defending side must think equally and stock up on efficient ammo (especially the chain guns, because a lot of JDAMS and tomahawks) will be coming their way.
Oh interesting side note for you people ragging on the S400. It has a 30% larger aperture than the AN_SPY1 radar on the Aegis battleships. Meaning it is basically an Aegis on land. Let me tell you that the Aegis can track golfball size objects, do you really think things are going to be undetected flying close to a modern integrated defense system. Here is what the S400 radar vs the Aegis radar looks like:
The radar mounted on the F/A-22 Raptor and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) can be used to fry electronic parts of ground-based radars and disable airborne cruise missiles, program officials for the planes acknowledge.
Originally posted by mad scientist
(The Air Force is said to have ruled out theories hinging on a stuck weapons-bay door, a descent to below 15,000 feet, or a hit by AAA.)17
Simple facts are the F-117 was shot down due to extreme luck even the Serb commander says this
Colonel Dani detected F-117s by operating his radars on unusually long wavelengths, making the aircraft visible to radar for brief periods.
With attacking an S-400 site there would be a multitude of tactics used
Not to mention a wave of cruise missiles preceeding any strike