Geiger Counter readings - Updated: Radioactive fallout wave travelling across U.S?

page: 10
36
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 04:28 PM
link   
reply to post by soundguy
 


Thank you it does help a little it is just that I get on here reviewing what informed posters are finding then I look at say radnet which reads say 20 or like yesterday a 9 then, someone like unity says wHOA!LOOK at the 225 in az. and I go what the hell?? Then I read where muzzleflash is statng that these readings are accurate and we are being lied to as well as posters are relaying incorrect info we are being showered and BREATHING RADIATION; ----- I then ask unity several posts who never answered once, then I ask phage and was answered with good info along with 2 other posters whom tried to help--- however, I am just really not sure where we are at all here and what to do at this time.




posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 04:32 PM
link   
Anyone see this link?
From:
Radiation Detection - Driggs Idaho
by sentinel007
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.ustream.tv...



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 04:33 PM
link   
So earlier I did call the EPA to see if the count is correct and the verdict is ... .. . .. . . .. .
_________________________________________________________________________

Jesus Lord Please Help Us !
_________________________

This is accurate. They also checked the instruments & turned it back to DARK BLUE WORKING MONITOR !

Fixed Monitor Location: NC: RALEIGH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 07:20:15 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 08:20:23 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 171221
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4677
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2663
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 732
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 396
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 257
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 291
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 200
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 56
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 74

This is only about 10 or 20 thousand less than earlier but still absolutely
deadly and dangerous radiation.

People buy your potassium iodide soon before all the stores on the internet
have a 5-6 week wait and you can buy your gas masks now.

"In Nomeni Patri Et Fili Spiritus Sancti"
(Latin for "In the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit")

You can call me Reverend, and I am praying for all of mankind.



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by survivor4
 

Well if that's the case people in Raleigh should have been dropping like flies on February 26, 2009. The beta count reached 1,221,559 then. Good thing it's cooled down since then.

Thanks Reverend



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


phage will you please tell me once again what is going on?? And how do I contact this radiation network what is this poster saying???



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by condition9
 

It is an instrumentation issue in Raleigh.


For Members of the Public: radiation.questions@epa.gov

I would imagine they are dealing with quite a bit of correspondence lately.



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
[more
I would imagine they are dealing with quite a bit of correspondence lately.
Laughing at that one but we too are worried here, Governments tend to hide the nasty stuff until it must be disclosed but if they can avoid it they will.
Regards, Iwinder



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:26 PM
link   
I posted this link in another thread but I think this may be useful here as well, It's a real time radiation counter for the US. It updates rads every few seconds. Enjoy www.radiationnetwork.com...



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by BigDuke6
 

That is not rads. It is CPM.
If it were rads no one would be left standing by now.



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Phage are you not finding it very troublesome and disturbing many places in the govt. and other areas are not giving out good information ?? I am monitoring what you guys are saying around the country but, I would like to know what the numbers mean on the orange circle on radnet site?



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:45 PM
link   
I tried the epa site I am not seemingly able to get to the info some are posting here also regarding tap water and food but, you are saying we are experiencing normal levels of radiation right now in u.s. across the south west/ thanks again I am trying to understand amidst all the conflicting info!



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 06:15 PM
link   
cdxnode64.epa.gov...

Fixed Monitor Location: WA: RICHLAND
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 08:59:19 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 09:59:27 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 141
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2062
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1279
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 411
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 198
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 134
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 165
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 88
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 56

Richland Wa just went up to 141 again.




Fixed Monitor Location: SD: RAPID CITY
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 06:05:13 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 07:05:22 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 166
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2376
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1558
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 446
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 248
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 136
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 168
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 94
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 37
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 40


SD Rapid city 166


Fixed Monitor Location: NE: KEARNEY
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 09:13:38 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 10:13:47 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 190
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2634
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1765
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 496
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 319
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 171
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 215
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 132
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 48
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 44


Kearney 190


Fixed Monitor Location: CO: COLORADO SPRINGS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 06:17:01 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 07:17:09 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 4302
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2579
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 802
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 380
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 256
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 372
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 115
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 92
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 136


Colorado Springs 186


Fixed Monitor Location: NV: LAS VEGAS
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/21/2011 06:09:04 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/21/2011 07:09:11 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 243
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2483
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1642
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 488
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 266
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 140
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 124
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 46
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 45


Los Vegas 243

Here there is a light rain outside, but its very fresh and clear smelling. Not like before.
edit on 21-3-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 06:19 PM
link   
reply to post by condition9
 

Unless you have some understanding of what radiation is and how it is measured it's hard to give a detailed explanation.

The CPM (counts per minute) figure shows the number of times the Geiger counter is "triggered". This gives an idea of the level of radioactivity. But translating this number to human terms (the "dose" of radioactivity) depends on the particular kind of radiation being detected (there can be several) and the sensitivity of the instrument being used to detect it.

Given the same amount of radioactivity, an instrument with higher sensitivity will register a higher CPM than one with lower sensitivity. That's why the CPM values are not really very useful.

The values from the EPA monitors can not be compared to the "civilian" monitors.
edit on 3/21/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 07:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


thanks again, so how would I know what true readings in az. are?



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
Small traces now showing up in Washington state.
www.komonews.com...

Hopefully the levels do not continue to rise.



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:04 PM
link   
reply to post by condition9
 

Without knowing the details of the (sensitivity) of the instruments you can't.



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:06 PM
link   
Also, this cdxnode.64 epa/gov. page will not open I have tried a few times .



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99
Its heading our way. Richland Washington, radnet

Fixed Monitor Location: WA: RICHLAND
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/19/2011 08:28:34 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/19/2011 09:28:42 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 133


Wow, you think 133 is bad, you should have seen it in Richland WA a few days before the accident! It got to 243!!!

2011-03-08 00:48:01 47
2011-03-08 01:48:13 33
2011-03-08 02:48:26 17
2011-03-08 03:48:38 50
2011-03-08 04:48:50 33
2011-03-08 06:49:14 2
2011-03-08 07:49:26 1
2011-03-08 08:49:39 3
2011-03-08 05:49:02 4
2011-03-08 09:49:51 3
2011-03-08 10:50:03 3
2011-03-08 11:50:15 4
2011-03-08 12:50:27 3
2011-03-08 13:50:39 3
2011-03-08 14:50:51 4
2011-03-08 15:51:04 4
2011-03-08 16:51:16 4
2011-03-08 17:51:28 17
2011-03-08 18:51:41 57
2011-03-08 19:51:53 62
2011-03-08 20:52:05 85
2011-03-08 21:52:18 169
2011-03-08 22:52:30 195
2011-03-08 23:52:42 186
2011-03-09 00:52:54 151
2011-03-09 01:53:07 94
2011-03-09 02:53:19 50
2011-03-09 03:53:32 33
2011-03-09 04:53:44 25
2011-03-09 05:53:57 34
2011-03-09 06:54:09 38
2011-03-09 07:54:21 32
2011-03-09 08:54:33 33
2011-03-09 09:54:45 23
2011-03-09 10:54:57 21
2011-03-09 11:55:10 21
2011-03-09 12:55:22 16
2011-03-09 13:55:34 12
2011-03-09 14:55:46 12
2011-03-09 15:55:58 13
2011-03-09 16:56:11 31
2011-03-09 17:56:23 36
2011-03-09 18:56:35 146
2011-03-09 19:56:47 243
2011-03-09 20:57:00 195
2011-03-09 21:57:12 173
2011-03-09 22:57:25 180
2011-03-09 23:57:37 117
2011-03-10 00:57:49 102
2011-03-10 01:58:01 140
2011-03-10 02:58:13 130
2011-03-10 03:58:25 122
2011-03-10 04:58:38 104
2011-03-10 05:58:50 74
2011-03-10 06:59:02 61
2011-03-10 08:59:26 37
2011-03-10 07:59:14 52
2011-03-10 09:59:38 26
2011-03-10 10:59:51 30
2011-03-10 12:00:03 34
2011-03-10 13:00:15 29
2011-03-10 14:00:27 37
2011-03-10 15:00:39 27
2011-03-10 16:00:51 38
2011-03-10 17:01:02 55
2011-03-10 18:01:15 48
2011-03-10 19:01:27 49
2011-03-10 20:01:40 47
2011-03-10 21:01:52 42
2011-03-10 22:43:07 61
2011-03-10 23:43:20 108
*



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:11 PM
link   
reply to post by condition9
 

Try going to the map view
cdxnode64.epa.gov...

Then clicking on Query View on the left panel. It can take a while, the site is busy.



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:15 PM
link   
edit on 21-3-2011 by whatwasthat because: cx lots of typos, I will try again





new topics




 
36
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join