It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DarthPhobos
Originally posted by routerboy
Libya would be best just staying quiet, last I heard - they're giving a million people guns. What's that going to do. More will die.
I think you will find that is called, 'defending themselves'.
Everry human in every land has the right to defend themselves, every country has the right to defend itself from attack of forign forces
Originally posted by michaelknives52
How does murdering OMAR solve anything. even if he is killed members of his regime and family will still fight. They are going to pretty much have to commit genocide and murder the whole Kaddaffi clan and political party. Will the rebels have to answer for that genocide. WAR SUCKS U.S. should have minded their own business like China. You start something you need to finish it. In order to save North Koreans why doesn't the U.S. attack and destroy their military regardless of what china says... hmmmmmmm. For now on I will be looking for updates that will spark WW3
US warships and submarines fired more than 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles into Libyan territory to disable air-defense systems, allowing French and British fighter jets to more easily enforce a no-fly zone. The attack on Libya marks the third Muslim country that the United States is now engaged in military operations with.
Libya is ranked as one of the top-ten biggest oil producers in the world.
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
I don't think Libya has enough "air-defence systems" for 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles (have you seen a single AA gun fired) ?
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
Libya is ranked as one of the top-ten biggest oil producers in the world.
Nuff said. The future will show.
16:51 Col Gaddafi has said that Libya's oil "will not be left to the USA, Britain and France", the BBC reports
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
The Russian government seems highly opposed to the matter, I wonder why ? What are their gains in this ? Any ideas ?
Here is another article:
rt.com...
I don't think Libya has enough "air-defence systems" for 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles (have you seen a single AA gun fired) ?
Libya is ranked as one of the top-ten biggest oil producers in the world.
Nuff said. The future will show.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
I don't think Libya has enough "air-defence systems" for 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles (have you seen a single AA gun fired) ?
Not been watching the reports then, I take it? AA fire has been heard in Tripoli and other places all last night.
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
Libya is ranked as one of the top-ten biggest oil producers in the world.
Nuff said. The future will show.
Top ten producer? Try 18th. The UK produces more oil than Libya.
And no, this isn't an oil war. We were already set up in Libya, probably on more favourable terms than we'll get off the rebels, long before this all kicked off.edit on 20/3/11 by stumason because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Smurfwicked
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
The Russian government seems highly opposed to the matter, I wonder why ? What are their gains in this ? Any ideas ?
Here is another article:
rt.com...
I don't think Libya has enough "air-defence systems" for 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles (have you seen a single AA gun fired) ?
Libya is ranked as one of the top-ten biggest oil producers in the world.
Nuff said. The future will show.
Like I stated in a earlier post, militarily and economically Russia and China are still very much so enemies of America. It isn't so much about oil as some would like us to believe, but each and every diplomatic decision the USA makes is part of a long term military strategy. Saying that I can't honestly say I'm totally against the long term military strategy.
I'm pretty sure I seen a news headline last night stating one cruise missile hit 4 tanks which shouldn't have anything to do with the no fly zone.
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
That was a good reply, finally some facts.
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
Well if it isn't an oil war then the real motive doesn't make any sense to me. Unfortunately I'm not buying all that "the allied forces are going through all this trouble to help civilians" stuff.
Since when do they care this much ?
Originally posted by Smurfwicked
I'm pretty sure I seen a news headline last night stating one cruise missile hit 4 tanks which shouldn't have anything to do with the no fly zone.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
"Facts" can be supported with evidence, they are not a mere statement from another person. If that were the case I could say that "the anti aircraft fire that has allegedly been hear over night is faked" and that would be a fact. But its not. Its just a claim until supported by evidence.
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
Well if it isn't an oil war then the real motive doesn't make any sense to me. Unfortunately I'm not buying all that "the allied forces are going through all this trouble to help civilians" stuff.
Since when do they care this much ?
Originally posted by ModerateSkeptic
Just look at the maps of the nations having "unrest" right now, and imagine you are an oil pipeline to the coast and then an oil tanker headed to "the west" and you might see why these nations are suddenly all yearning to breathe free.