It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Christian Voice
reply to post by TKDRL
Calm down, poster was just making light of a specific point. Too many liberal tree hugging people complaining about this. I do agree we don't need to be involved at all, but do you just suggest that we continue to allow this idiot to murder his people?
Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa, in comments on Egypt's official state news agency, wants an emergency meeting of the organisation. "What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians," he said.
Top US military commander Admiral Mike Mullen has acknowledged that the military end-game is "very uncertain", and that it could end in stalemate with Col Gaddafi.
Russian officials have steadily been against any foreign intervention into Libya’s domestic affairs, saying the West should let such turmoil-gripped countries choose their own way of development.
Originally posted by Kram09
Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa, in comments on Egypt's official state news agency, wants an emergency meeting of the organisation. "What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians," he said.
BBC News
Surprise, surprise.
I think they just needed the support of the Arab League as a rubber stamp. Once the wheels had been set in motion, it didn't matter too much what they think.
Originally posted by Kram09
Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa, in comments on Egypt's official state news agency, wants an emergency meeting of the organisation. "What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians," he said.
BBC News
Surprise, surprise.
I think they just needed the support of the Arab League as a rubber stamp. Once the wheels had been set in motion, it didn't matter too much what they think.
The Libyan people are about to be liberated. A great time for them!
Originally posted by brokenbullet56
Was watching state of the union this morning on CNN, why does every head of state and military official refuse to answer the questions "Is the goal to get rid of Gaddafi then leave?" "Will Gaddafi's departure end this military action?"edit on 20-3-2011 by brokenbullet56 because: (no reason given)
General Mark Kimmit tells CNN's Wolf Blitzer "we want Gadhafi gone."
Originally posted by DarthPhobos
Total Hypocrisy at best. How come in Bahrain the government can send their police out to kill protestors, in fact they are allowed to bring in foreign forces (The Saudi's) to help crush the uprising in their country, yet Libya arnt allowed to. Perhaps something to do with US bases in Bahrain has something to do with it. The worlds gone mad and im beginning to wonder what side is right in all this.edit on 20-3-2011 by DarthPhobos because: (no reason given)
Mullen said he had seen no reports of civilian casualties from the Western strikes. But Russia said there had been such casualties and called on Britain, France and the United States to halt the "non-selective use of force."
Mullen said he had seen no reports of civilian casualties from the Western strikes.
And the rebels yelled… “Freedom”? Nope. “Democracy”? No, wrong again. It was “Allah akbar!” Putting al Qaeda in charge of Libya at the expense of US taxpayers – that’s some foreign policy! Oh my, I’m missing Bush! He was dumb, but never so dumb! Or maybe not, maybe Obama is not dumb, and playing into the hands of Islamic militants is a part of his master plan of building relations with Islam.