It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Official PDF detailing Fukushima power plant damage

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 07:06 AM
link   
Here it is for you guys :

(Note the "pool temperature increasing" in 5 and 6 - Looks like it's going to get worse according to this document if they can't cool it.)

www.jaif.or.jp...
edit on 19-3-2011 by theghosthunter because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-3-2011 by theghosthunter because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-3-2011 by theghosthunter because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-3-2011 by theghosthunter because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-3-2011 by theghosthunter because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 07:24 AM
link   
Look at all that red and yellow status on the Summary page, not good.
All the ATS naysayers (HarryTuttle) are gonna stear clear of this official document!
This is the best thread in the new forum, thanks to both OPs!!!

edit on 19-3-2011 by Granite because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 07:43 AM
link   
reply to post by theghosthunter
 


When you say *insider * are you saying this document was leaked , and not meant for public viewing ? just want to be sure if it's freely available or not before I post it on FB and explain where it's from...cheers

PS) I gather new reports will come in from the same place as the days go by...what website do we go to to look for updates in the future ?
edit on 19/3/11 by cosmicpixie because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 07:51 AM
link   
reply to post by theghosthunter
 


I can't accept this document at face value and I strongly doubt it was from an "insider". The only insiders are the Japanese 50. Can you clarify your source?

Looking at the logo and where it's placed on the document, this is highly questional.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 07:52 AM
link   
What's really interesting me is that last page, which shows the status of other nuclear power plants in Japan.

Literally all of them look like they are pushed against the shore. So they are all technically susceptible to the same 1-2 punch EQ+Tsunami disaster that happened here.
edit on 19-3-2011 by Noscible because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 07:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by theghosthunter
 


I can't accept this document at face value and I strongly doubt it was from an "insider". The only insiders are the Japanese 50. Can you clarify your source?

Looking at the logo and where it's placed on the document, this is highly questional.


Maybe it wasn't given by an 'insider' but the source seems to be alright. It's hosted on the JAIF site, the Japan Atomic International Forum. An NGO involved with nuclear energy in Japan.

www.jaif.or.jp...



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by theghosthunter
 


This one has quite a bit more information than the one from the 16th March:

Same Report - from the 16th.

I believe the 16th was the last release on one of these, till now, and it looked pretty bad. This new one (19th) is worse.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Noscible
 


Ok....guess what.....it's not insider information because this is very much on Wikipedia and open for the whole world to see:

did'nt take much to poke around......

en.wikipedia.org...

You can tell your "insider" he's now the outsider LOL



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 08:07 AM
link   
Ok taken "insider" out of the title as it was misleading. I guess I meant, "from the Japanese Atomic Group." Apologies.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 08:16 AM
link   
this is an official report by www.jaif.or.jp...
it's public information
In fact this sheet has been published with updates every day for the past week



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 08:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by Noscible
 


Ok....guess what.....it's not insider information because this is very much on Wikipedia and open for the whole world to see:

did'nt take much to poke around......

en.wikipedia.org...

You can tell your "insider" he's now the outsider LOL


I wasn't disagreeing with you on the insider part. I agree it didn't look like it was released by an insider, which suggests a leak (of the wikileaks kind, not the radioactive kind). I was responding to your question about the source.




top topics



 
6

log in

join