Mods, I just realized this probably should have went into the general conspiracy thread. I appologize and please move if needed.
This is my second attempt at this thread since I accidently lost all info I was working on.
I think it is important so I will make another run at it. I feel it deserves its own thread to talk about this situation at hand. The thread moves too
fast and the info is already lost.
I made this post in this thread.
I will use two photos of the building number three in Japan. One older and one newer(kind of..lol), to make my hypothesis.
Here it goes. My original post.
Ok, call me crazy but I am going to go with the media being used to bend the truth on this one. I feel this may be important so if some one could
look. I am suggesting photo shop from TPTB..
In this picture I was looking at the damage of the number three reactor building. I edited it and circled the area red. I hope this helps.
I got my proper orientation in my head and was comparing this photo with the zoomed in damage photo. I was interested in the upper left hand portion
of reactor number three building in the photo above, to the left of the arrow. I was inspecting the roof truss system and surrounding structure. (From
the original zoom it looks like road or "yard" above the building). I zoomed in pretty close but not to close, because of pixelation...lol..I do not
know what the zoom range it was in. I could check again if needed.
What I thought was strange, is the shadows(or lack of) of the wall to the left of the building, and the area directly right of this wall. My circle
extended a little low, so focus above the shadow of the hole. I know it is a bunch of wreckage, but focus on the roof trusses and the ground. There is
no shadows in this section of roof. It is also more blurry(way more blurry to me) than the rest of the photo when you scroll around.
When I noticed this I read some of the article and it said notice "the steam is no longer visible". The crazy thing is, this blurry spot I am talking
about is right where the steam is coming from in this photo.
Look real closely, I think that we are being lied to. This is a major developement to me here. I think I may have found the proof.
I cannot sound too crazy here, people have been claiming twisted facts and falsification by the media the whole time. I think there is something with
this because I just sat and stared at the photo for 5 minutes or so with the girlfriend talking to me. She gor upset because I was not listening to
her. Please I am shaking right now and I hope the men in black don't come get me.
(end of post)
Now I personally have been waiting on some sort of "evidence" that TPTB have been lying to us. I have yet to see any concrete proof. I hope that the
members of ATS can verify this, or post their own "solid" proof.
My hypothesis goes something like this:
I believe that TPTB needed some good hard evidence of improvement. Things have been cast in negative light all along and people are scared. (They (we)
have every right to be). What better news than the steam from the building number 3 has ceased? Remember,(how can we forget) number three has been
the focus of the devastation and doom. Not to forget to mention about the money problems that the companies and stock holder's will endure if it does
not improve. Here is what I see that makes me look even closer.
DigitalGlobe has released a new satellite image of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear site in Japan taken at 10:20AM local time on March 18, 2011. The
most significant difference in the new image is the lack of any visible steam above the damaged reactor building for unit 3. In both the March 16 and
March 17 images, steam can be seen venting out of the top of the building.
Steam can still be seen venting out of a hole on the side of the unit 2 reactor building where workers removed a panel. .
Now "the most significant difference is the lack of any visible steam". This is posted above the picture in the text. It is definitely a significant
difference. Now look again at the blurry spot in the overhead photo, lack of shadows, and the steam in the damaged photo.Hmmm.
If you have read my post then I think you can notice the differences. If this is not the proof then I am all exiced for nothing.
I would like this thread to discuss the validity of the first photo and if it has been tampered with. Also I do believe that I have stumbled upon
something. So please be nice if you do not think so. But please share your insight on this situation.
Thank you and if there is any questions please ask. I will proof read it a few times but if anything is not clear then I can explain upon asking. I
need to smoke because I am still in shock from realizing this. I just found this and I am still looking for more "evidence".
edit on 18-3-2011
by liejunkie01 because: Mod note
edit on 18-3-2011 by liejunkie01 because: above
EDIT: I finally figured it out. Notice it looks good at regular zoom. Exept for the shadows. Zoom in a little and compare the surrounding shadows and
blurryness. For clarification, I believe they took out the steam, or whatever, to say it is better and no worries.
edit on 18-3-2011 by
liejunkie01 because: EDIT
edit on 18-3-2011 by liejunkie01 because: (no reason given)