It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gay Marriage Acceptance or No Jobs
Originally posted by mamabeth
I believe that a marriage is between a man and a woman
Originally posted by mamabeth
I believe that a marriage is between a man and a woman,not same
sex unions.I think that it is wrong to force a lifestyle, that many
find repugnant,onto our society.
Originally posted by mamabeth
So,I assume from your post reply that you agree
that jobs should be lost because of gay marriage bans?
Originally posted by mamabeth
When "they" try and FORCE states to
accept their abominable lifestyle....
Originally posted by mamabeth
I am requesting that this thread be closed because
all of your comments are making me sick!
Originally posted by mamabeth
I take it from the replies on this thread,everyone
believes states should lose jobs if the gay marriage
bans aren't reversed.
I am requesting that this thread be closed because
all of your comments are making me sick!
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by mamabeth
I gave you a Star and Flag for that Post . The Logic and Reason of it will Definately Fall on Deaf Ears to some on this Board , BRAVO !
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by JonoEnglish
For what . Being MAN ENOUGH to Speak my Mind Drac ? Who are you , my Father ? ......
That perception is a worry for companies that are competing nationally to attract highly skilled workers to Indiana, said Jill Cook, vice president of human resources for engine maker Cummins Inc.
She said putting a gay marriage ban in the state constitution would "cause irreparable harm" to Indiana's business climate and complicate the company's decisions on where to locate some high-paying professional jobs.
We will be reluctant to add those jobs if Indiana is a less welcoming and inclusive place for all of our employees," Cook said. Shaun Hawkins, chief diversity officer for Eli Lilly and Co., said attorneys for the drug maker were worried that the amendment's ban on "a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage" was vague and could impair its ability to offer domestic partner benefits.