It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ann Coulter: 'Radiation is Actually Good For You' (Video)

page: 7
38
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
absolute propaganda if I have ever heard it. People like her are worthless. I don't know if this is an attempt for the government to lie and "calm down" the Americans on the west coast but it is lies none the less. Thanks America, I love being lied to.




posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by DrZERO
 


Without Ann Coulter, how would we be able to distinguish been fact and fantasy? Thank you, Ann!

/SARCASM



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 03:48 PM
link   
She should fly to Salt Lake City then:


Fixed Monitor Location: SD: RAPID CITY
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/19/2011 01:54:11 PM
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/19/2011 02:54:19 PM
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 244
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2564
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1732
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 512
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 254
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 146
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 194
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 97
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 35
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 38



It was at 190 beta gross count, and that top one is the one that counts, at Idaho. 125 is supposed to be bad.
cdxnode64.epa.gov...

US Gov one at that.

If she really wants to be healthy, she should follow the cloud, that came in San Francisco then headed to Los Vegas with high readings of 187 last night, to Tuscon, that had those readings along with disbursing to Idaho, with 190. Those areas have dropped.

This is high.

But surely she jests.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by LiquidNova
 


It is an attempt by a member of the MSM to bring scientific debate about a potential preventative/treatment for one of man kind's greatest biological enemies from obscurity and MSM oppression to the forefront of debate and discussion. I for one think that her actions in bringing these reports to national attention warrant praise not demonization.

I don't understand how people can be lauded on ATS for saying that a blacked out box on google sky is proof that Niburu is coming; but a major news anchor be denigrated for trying to bring attention to a study the MSM is trying to keep quiet.

Now here is the million dollar question. If Anne Coulter came out tomorrow and exposed "chemtrails", or "nibiru", or "the NWO" as real with undeniable scientific proof and ample evidence of other forms would you all still scoff at her and say she is an MSM disinfo agent or would you immediately call for her canonization into sainthood?



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 03:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by LiquidNova
 


It is an attempt by a member of the MSM to bring scientific debate about a potential preventative/treatment for one of man kind's greatest biological enemies from obscurity and MSM oppression to the forefront of debate and discussion. I for one think that her actions in bringing these reports to national attention warrant praise not demonization.

I don't understand how people can be lauded on ATS for saying that a blacked out box on google sky is proof that Niburu is coming; but a major news anchor be denigrated for trying to bring attention to a study the MSM is trying to keep quiet.

Now here is the million dollar question. If Anne Coulter came out tomorrow and exposed "chemtrails", or "nibiru", or "the NWO" as real with undeniable scientific proof and ample evidence of other forms would you all still scoff at her and say she is an MSM disinfo agent or would you immediately call for her canonization into sainthood?


She was being a smart ass, wanting attention, nothing more. It's common sense that radiation is BENEFICIAL TO CANCER PATIENTS, and even then it's done in a controlled environment in a specific location, we are not talking about radiation from medical devices, we art talking about radiation from spent fuel rods and nuclear reactors, which is far more uncontrollable and volatile.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by LiquidNova
 


It is an attempt by a member of the MSM to bring scientific debate about a potential preventative/treatment for one of man kind's greatest biological enemies from obscurity and MSM oppression to the forefront of debate and discussion. I for one think that her actions in bringing these reports to national attention warrant praise not demonization.

I don't understand how people can be lauded on ATS for saying that a blacked out box on google sky is proof that Niburu is coming; but a major news anchor be denigrated for trying to bring attention to a study the MSM is trying to keep quiet.

Now here is the million dollar question. If Anne Coulter came out tomorrow and exposed "chemtrails", or "nibiru", or "the NWO" as real with undeniable scientific proof and ample evidence of other forms would you all still scoff at her and say she is an MSM disinfo agent or would you immediately call for her canonization into sainthood?


Nice rant. Next time spell her name right. It's Ann. Not Anne.

And she isn't coming out and exposing "chemtrails", or "nibiru", or "the NWO" - she's saying radiation is good for you. So suck it up, chump. She's an idiot.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Dilligaf28
 


It is about the messenger..
I want to know..
Where is Anne Coulters Medical Degree from? Where did she go to study Nuclear Engineering and/or Chemistry?

This kind of evidence is worthless from her, she's a crack pot that no longer even qualifies as a journalist, but rather America's biggest mid-aged white female attention whore.

I have no care to here about stunning breakthroughs in Medical Science from someone that isn't actually educated in that regard.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uniceft17

Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by LiquidNova
 


It is an attempt by a member of the MSM to bring scientific debate about a potential preventative/treatment for one of man kind's greatest biological enemies from obscurity and MSM oppression to the forefront of debate and discussion. I for one think that her actions in bringing these reports to national attention warrant praise not demonization.

I don't understand how people can be lauded on ATS for saying that a blacked out box on google sky is proof that Niburu is coming; but a major news anchor be denigrated for trying to bring attention to a study the MSM is trying to keep quiet.

Now here is the million dollar question. If Anne Coulter came out tomorrow and exposed "chemtrails", or "nibiru", or "the NWO" as real with undeniable scientific proof and ample evidence of other forms would you all still scoff at her and say she is an MSM disinfo agent or would you immediately call for her canonization into sainthood?


She was being a smart ass, wanting attention, nothing more. It's common sense that radiation is BENEFICIAL TO CANCER PATIENTS, and even then it's done in a controlled environment in a specific location, we are not talking about radiation from medical devices, we art talking about radiation from spent fuel rods and nuclear reactors, which is far more uncontrollable and volatile.


Can you please site for me where Anne has said anything in the interview that sounds remotely like what you just said? You cant because she did not say anything of the sort in the interview. If you want to put words in her mouth you are free to do so but that does not mean I have to believe she said them when my own ears have heard her say the opposite.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by JRCrowley
 


She is an idiot for reporting what several independent scientific studies from around the world are saying about low level dosages of radiation having a positive effect on the body? She didn't do the studies the scientists did, she is merely reporting them.

So who is the idiot? Anne (I will spell it that way if i choose my spelling of her name has no bearing on the statements she made nor the validity of mine and to insinuate otherwise is rubbish) for reporting about what scientific studies have shown, or you for brushing her and her information aside merely because she is Anne Coulter?



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by Dilligaf28
 


It is about the messenger..
I want to know..
Where is Anne Coulters Medical Degree from? Where did she go to study Nuclear Engineering and/or Chemistry?

This kind of evidence is worthless from her, she's a crack pot that no longer even qualifies as a journalist, but rather America's biggest mid-aged white female attention whore.

I have no care to here about stunning breakthroughs in Medical Science from someone that isn't actually educated in that regard.


Using your logic only qualified experts from various fields can now be reporters on television. She is a reporter. a reporter reports (OMG who would have thought) what others discover/say/create etc. etc. etc. She is not a scientist and she did not do research in any of the studies. According to your logic the next time we have a report about a military action only a general or someone in the military is qualified to report it. Logically that flows into the sports report only being given by the coaches of the particular sport being reported on. Next we'll have only collision experts and traffic regulators doing the traffic report, again by your logic.

I think you have just greatly confounded the way the news will flow at night. Constantly changing reporters so that every single story is reported by a bona fide expert in that field is going to make for some very interesting news programs.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by JRCrowley
she's saying radiation is good for you. So suck it up, chump. She's an idiot.


If saying that low level radiation is not dangerous, is certifiably stupid, then just point out the obvious confounding factors in the radon study that they missed, that caused the inverse relationship and claim your $10,000 prize……… It’s that easy…………



The closest attempt at someone has made to claiming the prize is trying to state that there may be a side effect of radon/radiaton exposure that causes people to not smoke as much/stop smoking/or not start smoking. Which would cause an inverse relationship between smokers and radon exposure. But there has been no evidence of such effect, even in the data that was collected in the study, so that one didn’t stick.

edit on 19-3-2011 by Mr Tranny because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dilligaf28
reply to post by JRCrowley
 


She is an idiot for reporting what several independent scientific studies from around the world are saying about low level dosages of radiation having a positive effect on the body?


and how do you know its the truth? you don't. wait, about to cite me some info that proves you are right? how do you know THAT is true? Just because you read it somewhere or someone said its true, you want to believe them? i say give me proof. I deny ignorance not support it. if there was some third world apartment emitting radiation and she says it happened i say give me a lab and some ACTUAL evidence. You and many many other Americans are just so used to believing what ever the government tells you and not questioning it. ever stop to think that the government is greedy humans and are capable of lying? They rule the country after all... how much easier could it be to get away with a lie. Or a couple thousand lies...



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by LiquidNova
 


Ask an ye shall receive! This is a link to a .pdf file which studied the effects of the radiation in the said building. Take careful note of the authors, for while it was published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, the authors are of asian descent and as best as I can ascertain the study was performed in China.

So here we have a report, just as you asked, authored outside of the U.S., which backs up what Anne Coulter was saying. I await your response even though I half way expect it to be another "thats not credible because it conflicts with my world view" sort of response.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:08 PM
link   
check out the Aug 1993 issue of Scientific American and the article about the RADITHOR craze of the 1920's.
seems back in '20s it was fashionable to drink a highly radioactive concoction of Radium & Thorium (Radithor).
deemed as a cure all, the drink actually did energize the body for a while...
unfortunately, it didn't take long before people started dying from the drink...
heavy drinkers of the stuff started came down with all kinds of medical problems.

from wikipedia...
...The story of socialite Eben Byers's death from Radithor consumption and the associated radiation poisoning found its way into The Wall Street Journal under the title "The Radium Water Worked Fine Until His Jaw Came Off", which led to the strengthening of the Food and Drug Administration's powers and the demise of most radiation quack cures.

bottom line... Ann Coulter is an idiot if she thinks radiation/radioactivity is good for you.
edit on 19-3-2011 by arufon because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:16 PM
link   
Who the # cares what some dumb ignorant fool says? Why do we keep giving attention that these polarizing left and right wing idiots clearly crave? If news or anyone else wants to investigate a topic like this then go to experts, not some political talking head who clearly has an agenda. God I hate what this country has become.
edit on 19-3-2011 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   
Somehow I believe that radiation really is good for Ann Coulter.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Unity_99
 


F me running my buddy and his dad are out camping near Salt Lake. I told them not to go but it's Spring Break. Has anyone thought about this yet? How many kids are this woman and all of the media confusing. People young and old are especially susceptible propaganda and guided stupidity when made to be afraid. Fear is a base emotion and overrides higher thinking in order to facilitate survival. Before any of you younger guys chime in remember I'm not that much older than you and I was dumb enough to go kill Muslim peasants when I was 19. They are using this for some inconceivably evil plan to make more money selling us cures for diseases they create by exposing us to poison as much as possible!

Thread started to discuss radiation effects. www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
She's a complete waste of time/food/air.
So far I haven't found one thing she's ever said as (a) relevant, (b) factual, (c) non self-serving.

I can't believe she gets any air time at all. She's as dumb as a box of rocks and about as useful.



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
Anne Coulter, would you please head butt a knife? I know its just her shtick to be ignorant and tick people off, but this takes the cake - If Ms. Coulter thinks radiation isnt dangerous i'll gladly show her the videos of my grandmother getting her chemotherapy treatment and being violently sick for days after. Im kind of upset with God for giving Anne Coulter the ability to vocalize and/or communicate in any way with others. Its not really her opinions that bother me (as I know most are contrived to rile up the audience), its just really her nasally, uppity voice and her personality of a dead moth that drives me crazy!



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 06:05 PM
link   
I am searching now for health benefits for any levels of radiation. It is possible that we have all been lied to all these years and in actuality radiation is the fountain of youth or something along these lines.

If a fountain of youth was discovered by people who want depopulation or population control, would it make sense to totally manipulate the world population into thinking the radiation is poison, deadly and bad for ones health?

I do look forward to my future investigations to see just if radiation has benefits that are hidden from the public's eyes.

To think text books and scientists and government health organizations have no fraud, disinformation, corruption, manipulation would be limiting to the education of the mind.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join