posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 07:54 PM
reply to post by Dilligaf28
No worries, you had said something to the affect that I was dodging your inquiries. I said that I didn't think that was the case and asked you to
clarify. Later in the day you had made responses to other posters but said nothing about the queries I was dodging, so I made that post.
But honestly I don't think it matters. I see your perspective and you and the previous poster are correct with your descriptions of the interview.
My point, as the previous poster echoed, was that the timing of the interview was poor. Combine that with O'Reilly starting the interview by saying
Ann Coulter has a new column out about the situation in Japan, and then she starts her column with the Japanese are better off being exposed comment
just leaves me wondering what the true intentions of the piece really were.
To me it seems like a propaganda piece to minimize peoples perceptions of what's going on with that reactor and how it will affect the rest of the
world by correlating it with these radiation hormesis studies. I think that if there is any benefit to these studies Coulter has effectively
demonized them by bringing them up in this context, and the responses that you have seen in this thread are testament to that assertion.
This is my opinion and you are free to disagree. I think I have clarified my point in this and previous posts, but let me know if you still feel that
I have somehow not addressed one or more of your statements.
edit on 20-3-2011 by DrZERO because: (no reason given)