It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warbird03
I think maybe we should clarify what is meant by "kid" and "children"
I was coming across similiar subjects through books when I was around 10 years old and I turned out relatively fine. Any younger than that and kids likely wouldn't even understand what is going on, let alone be traumatized by it. Especially with kids these days and all the horrible things available elsewhere on TV.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Reply to post by James1982
It's okay when it's in a books because nobody reads.
Once it's on TV people freak out because their little couch world is being invaded.
I can't see this on mobile but am I right that this is that like 30 year old Twain claymation thing that was never intended for kids anyway?
The whole thing is a stupid non-issue. You don't want to watch it don't. Don't want your kids watching it then be a parent.
I saw it as a kid. Watched it a few times I think. I thought it was very fun and pretty insightful.
But then I also read as a kid so these concepts weren't shocking new or extreme.
When did people lose touch with the abstract? For all of our access to art, literature and global experiences we seem more rigid, literal and cold now than we were when I was growing up.
I wonder if Pee Wee's Playhouse woukd be permitted on television today?
Each generation gets dumber and dumber.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by warbird03
Definetly not your "ordinary" cartoon. Most cartoons these days are complete and utter crap though.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
I saw this when I was a kid. I thought it was weird but I was weird so it didn't really bother me. To be honest I only remember seeing it briefly because I switched channels. I saw it years later when I was a teenager and thought it was real imaginary and cool. I think if your'e a strong religious person you might think that this 'cartoon' is secular and attempting to change your children. The reality is this isn't a cartoon. It shouldn't be marketed to children. If it was, I'm ashamed that it was. But I don't think its creators were trying to brainwash your kids.
Originally posted by dude69
reply to post by TechVampyre
Hmm...I remember liking " deep " cartoons when I was a kid. Or...more sophisticated cartoons...like " The last unicorn " for example...I think more cartoons should be like that. Kids can handle it. Did I just say cartoons 3 times?...cartoons.
Originally posted by warbird03
Reply to post by TechVampyre
Something I just thought of, maybe it would be better to compare it to some fairy tales in their original form. There's really a lot of gruesome stuff there and they were meant for kids. Wolves eating people, poisoned apples, people cutting off parts of their feet to fit in a glass show and if I remember correctly, sleeping beauty is raped in her sleep in the original (un-disneyfied) version.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by dude69
reply to post by TechVampyre
Hmm...I remember liking " deep " cartoons when I was a kid. Or...more sophisticated cartoons...like " The last unicorn " for example...I think more cartoons should be like that. Kids can handle it. Did I just say cartoons 3 times?...cartoons.