It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Barack Obama: The Weakest President In History?

page: 5
46
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   
I said from the day i seen a black president even having a chance of being elected, This is going to F up the whole world, And im black,

I told all the people i knew that its a scam of some sort but nobody listend.

I told them, the elites will now rape the world, then in the long run they will blame it on the black man, and the people that voted him in, "This is what happens when you put a black man in charge"

And i was sayin all this when he still had hope, Two years later im saying i told you so.

Since the day he was elected my political views on facebook have been: OBAMMAGEDDON, It was so obvious, Such a joke it should have been a reality TV show.

True story




posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   
reply to post by MagickWithoutTears
 


This isn't what happens when you put a black man in charge. This is what happens when people put a transnational socialist in charge who hates everything about America and is chomping at the bit to collapse this country and hand it over to globalist dictatorships like the UN.

Same thing would have happened if we had put a white dude like Richard Trumka(head of AFL-CIO) in charge. It's all one worlder bull..



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 06:21 PM
link   
he´s 33 degree mason and he does as the tell him to. weak is not the right word. the president is coverd and traitor to the real great american people! we can do it, what the F is that all about! no you can´t is better for him to say. he should clime back to the rock he came crawling from in the first place!



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 07:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by MagickWithoutTears
 


This isn't what happens when you put a black man in charge. This is what happens when people put a transnational socialist in charge who hates everything about America and is chomping at the bit to collapse this country and hand it over to globalist dictatorships like the UN.

Same thing would have happened if we had put a white dude like Richard Trumka(head of AFL-CIO) in charge. It's all one worlder bull..


Has it ever occurred that the world and its views and ideology have moved beyond what the sanctuary of what once protected the U.S. has suddenly and inevitably has been altered without the option of going back to "how it was". The human race is evolving at pace that simply by logging into your email account is estimated at being a ten year outdated method. The global change is what it is and has no room for those who wish or choose to live in the past. One must inevitably come to terms that what you once or who ever had as a comfort zone are simply not applicable to today's current events on a unilateral application.

Welcome to the New World Order.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 07:36 PM
link   
reply to post by tristar
 


Sorry, but no thanks.

Most of the singular world body, the United Nations, is made up of mostly autocracies ruled by self serving despots.

I don't want to be part of a "community" where most of the neighbors are gangsters and thugs and have to cede to them any authority over how we handle business in the US. There's already enough on our plate without having to deal with the consequences of giving up our national sovereignty for the sake of "world evolution" to a gaggle of dictators.
edit on 18-3-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 07:37 PM
link   
reply to post by centurion1211
 


Weakest, no that goes to Goerge Bush I Or SR Whatever, but stupidest maybe!



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 07:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by tristar
 


Sorry, but no thanks.

Most of the singular world body, the United Nations, is made up of mostly autocracies ruled by self serving despots.

I don't want to be part of a "community" where most of the neighbors are gangsters and thugs and have to cede to them any authority over how we handle business in the US. There's already enough on our plate without having to deal with the consequences of giving up our national sovereignty for the sake of "world evolution" to a gaggle of dictators.
edit on 18-3-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)


I if i may point out, this isnt about a nations physical or electronic borders, it has moved beyond that aspect of reality. It has been for well over a decade regardless or not if the public was and has been informed of a means to unitize laws and applications regardless of how and what methods its citizens choose or mobilizes itself. These methods as i pointed out previously are simply outdated, this is why everything has been so effective without little or no resistance. This is what i pointed out as the new world order. Keep in mind, i have no or am i person who runs down the street or within protests ranting or burning. Adapt, learn, and implement.
edit on 18-3-2011 by tristar because: utilize * ( more typos to follow, as sleep time or rr is significantly limited at this time)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 07:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Q2IN2Y
I honestly think he wanted to change things but the powers that be, I believe threatened his life.


You ever notice how passionate he was on the campaign trail and less than a few weeks in office, his whole demeanor changed?

Almost as if someone gave him an ultimatum


 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 


He met his agenda quota...... namely shove healthcare down our throats, and cause the deficit to rise, helping to destroy this country. Also, to answer your question, Obama is probably the most over-hyped President EVER.
edit on 18-3-2011 by thorazineshuffle because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


Project.. You mean if U.N. changes positions, based on financial gains for the Country it represents, thats unethical and immoral?
If you elect an ambassador to U.N. and you have a new regime..are'nt they allowed to make a buck and a profit?

For the new regime?

We'll get money to the commoners later. It's the people at the top...and then trickle down economics, as long as you play ball with the others at the top.

Oh...We already do that.
Welllll... Thank god we're doing that on behalf of democracy and humanitarion causes then. Profit last. Oh wait.. Nigeria good with that? Oh wait.. no one cares. .. Oh wait.. They pay a LOT to foriegn entities to hide the Shell Oil disaster.. no...Shell pays to shut that up.
Hmmmm.

I am SO fed up with Profit for Resources against any Country and it's people. I want to throw up when I hear or read it's for Democracy's sake.
When I read that Bush's sister stole all that land down in South America while she was on a United Way road trip...to steal the water rights from the people,I literally died inside.
This is just his daughter surveying the new property they bought. Other article when they signed the deeds don't pop up right now.
www.idigmygarden.com...

Probably off topic...but resources and land grabs from PTB should be a title.
And all their buddies.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
He is also the BEST man for the Job..... That is for the NEW WORLD ORDER



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 08:05 PM
link   
No, not at all. Anyone out there old enough to remember the Presidency of LBJ? This was a man who took no prisoners. He was the consummate "King Maker" of your period you know as the 1960'S. The picture of him crumpled at his long table, his head in his hand is for me, one of the most intense pictures of that time. Along with that young girl burned from napalm. This was a guy if you got in his way, you were crushed. And yet, that picture. The terrible truth. Is so deep. Wish I could add more, except I lived in that time. And I hope as a species we learn from our mistakes. I guess I have to wait along with everyone else.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 08:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Q2IN2Y
 



Originally posted by Q2IN2Y
Almost as if someone gave him an ultimatum


Of course...

It couldn't possibly be that once he attained the Presidency, he no longer had to lie to the electorate about his false intentions of being the purveyor of true political 'change'.


Charlatan.
edit on 18-3-2011 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 08:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by ldyserenity

Weakest, no that goes to Goerge Bush I Or SR Whatever, but stupidest maybe!


Hmmmm. Stupid, I think not. I do not think Barack Obama is a stupid man whether I support him or not. But you are obviously entitled to your own opinion. However, if you are going to spew vile statements you might want to consider reworking your signature a bit:


signature:
My philosophy is live and let live; and that lifting another brings more happiness to oneself than being lifted.....


Taken together they yield the stench of hypocrisy. Just sayin'.
And now you are entitled to my opinion. Practice what you preach sister.

edit on 18-3-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 08:17 PM
link   
I didn't vote for him but he is in a "damn if I don't and damn if I do" situation. The only set of cajones I see, so far, are Susan Rice's--U.S. Ambassador! If she ran for president--she'd have my vote!



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 08:20 PM
link   
reply to post by kinda kurious
 


No. I agree. He is not stupid.

He's a shrewd Chicago politician- a master of lies.

He's laughing at his 'base' and all of the unquestioning Americans who were memorized by the 'concept' of Obama. (Geraldine Ferraro called that one right from the beginning.
)

Bush and Rove made fun of their base too. Remember the 'religious nuts' comments?


Such a true Banana Republic...

:shk:



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 10:11 PM
link   
reply to post by centurion1211
 


Funny that you would quote an article saying that Obama is 'ineffectual' for not being more aggressive with Gadaffi when that was the criticism of the US prior to Obama- that the US was too aggressive and uni-lateral in concern to the word stage.

As usual, I see most of this criticism as self-contradictory.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 10:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by loam
reply to post by Q2IN2Y
 



Of course...

It couldn't possibly be that once he attained the Presidency, he no longer had to lie to the electorate about his false intentions of being the purveyor of true political 'change'.


Charlatan.[


I read opinion this a lot. Can you list, with sources, a number of these 'lies' that he has not even attempted to fulfill?

And please don't include examples like Gitmo where he tried and was stymied by congress. I'd prefer to see out right lies that he has completely abandoned fulfilling.


edit on 18-3-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 10:37 PM
link   
Agreed. When the man took office he had a sparkle in his eyes.

I noticed today actually, how that spark had left. He looks tired and overwhelmed.... mundane! I hear him speak, and I am forced to listen to roundabout answers to forthright questions. He's become a "politician."

I've always had the gumption that our presidents were simply martyrs placed in the forefront of a government that runs them. Bush, for instance.... "He's a fool, so let's give him the front seat to take the brunt." The underlying government holds the truth to what is happening in front of our very eyes. Congressmen and women, representatives of the house... all a facade.

What IS this government with whom we are dealing? Who is the REAL one/'s in charge. Why is it so important to them that we be left in the dark?

I've recently joined this site after several weeks of observing. I came here because in my heart I've always felt an underlying truth to the world around us... one that we are held away from... one that if we work together, I sincerely hope we can decode in order to better humanity. We in fact, are serving the greater good through seeking the fair truth.

Greetings all...



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   
Look, It's pretty simple. Obama is in way over his head for this job. Lets take a look at his experience, oh yeah thats right he doesn't have any. He is too worried about being a rock star than being a Leader, God forbid we have a disaster in the good ole US. I think people get hung up on Dem vs Repub, this needs to stop We need a President that is not worried about getting wealthy or popular and that will do what is best for the country and take us back to our roots. We have too many people that have a since of entitlment, they think they need the goverment to support them, pay thier electric bill or whatever. What happen to personal responsiblilty, come on people if the electric goes off tomorrow and doesn't come back on who's going to support you then.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 10:53 PM
link   
All I can say is everyone that voted for this guy should be ashamed.

Everyone who didn't vote for Paul in 08 should be ashamed.

Everyone that let the bailouts happen and didn't take to the streets should be ashamed.

I am not ashamed.







 
46
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join