It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

La Bruzzo wants to drug test welfare recepients...

page: 23
44
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by HaveAnotherOne

Originally posted by StigShen



Lol. Try again. Not only am I a Constitutional scholar, but I am also a member of the Sons of Liberty.


LOL


I am sure you are.

Hell, everyone should already know that given the astounding depth of Constitutional knowledge you have.


Perhaps you might enjoy this piece which I authored a few years ago...

marselusvanwagner.blogspot.com...




posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by StigShen
 


Any pain medication with Codeine in it will also spit out a false positive.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by larrydavid
 


Given that it was a parking lot of a public park, it wasnt owned by a single person.

Failure once again.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by StigShen
 


Any pain medication with Codeine in it will also spit out a false positive.


Don't forget the poppy seeds..



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Now this is a good way to lower what is spent... half to 30 % will stop applying...


Drug test every recipient, those that fail either get treatment or nothing...


then add in random surprise drug test for all involved...
why it failed four previous time I do not know but...


I'm all for this, especially if the testing is random, and tests for hardcore drugs as well.

And, for those defending the potheads...hey, if they have money for weed, then they have it for food and don't need the assist. I don't even have spare money for .......oops, said too much.

Anyhoo, I'm all for this idea.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by HaveAnotherOne
 


Yeah but isn't a public park funded by the tax payers?



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by StigShen
 


Whats the login and pw? Afterall, we need proof you own that before I spend time reading it. Feel free to u2u me the pertinent info and the change it 2 minutes afterwards.

A Constitutional scholar would have basic knowledge of the GW clause. You obviously do not.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by HaveAnotherOne
reply to post by StigShen
 


Lol Yea, I feel the need to lie on an internet forum.



Perhaps if you weren't such an ignoramus, you would actually have money in your pocket now.

You haven't lived until you've slept in a car during the summer in Phoenix. Lots of fun



Evidently you skipped right over this part:



Saved up enough, took a few classes at a community college






edit on 3/18/11 by StigShen because: (no reason given)


And evidently you skipped right over every actual point I made.
edit on 3/18/11 by StigShen because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by HaveAnotherOne
 


oh my gosh really? This member does not need to give his(or her); log in information as proof. Shesh!
edit on 18-3-2011 by dreamseeker because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by StigShen
 


Any pain medication with Codeine in it will also spit out a false positive.


Seems to me that poppy seed bagels will give one a "positive" for opiates...



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by HaveAnotherOne
reply to post by larrydavid
 


Given that it was a parking lot of a public park, it wasnt owned by a single person.

Failure once again.


Oh you mean a public park THAT WAS PAID FOR AND MAINTAINED BY TAX DOLLARS?
The public park that is OWNED BY THE CITY?
The public park THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU?

Huge Failure on your part. Such a hippocrite.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Amaterasu
 


Yep, in fact people would be surprised at the amount of everyday items that can produce false positives.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by HaveAnotherOne
reply to post by larrydavid
 


Given that it was a parking lot of a public park, it wasnt owned by a single person.

Failure once again.


It is against the law to park in a public park overnight in Phoenix. Vagrancy is also illegal.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by dreamseeker
reply to post by HaveAnotherOne
 


Yeah but isn't a public park funded by the tax payers?



Bwhahahahhahhaaahh !!!!!

Exactly! He "used" help from tax payer dollars.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by thorazineshuffle
 


They did this in Michigan years ago but they didn't specify the number of kids. It was simple; if your'e on welfare and you pop another one out, you don't get additional funds, regardless of how many you currently have.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Kryties
 


I am glad this point was brought up because it really proves my orginal point is that is unfair to do this. When I said everyone should be tested everywhere of course I was making an absurd overexgeration.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by Amaterasu
 


Yep, in fact people would be surprised at the amount of everyday items that can produce false positives.


All the more reason to just let go of this uptight attitude and NOT spend money on the tests (which aren't worth a whole hell of a lot) and "treatment."



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
I hate this mouse.
edit on 3/18/2011 by Amaterasu because: Double Post



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gazrok

I'm all for this, especially if the testing is random, and tests for hardcore drugs as well.

And, for those defending the potheads...hey, if they have money for weed, then they have it for food and don't need the assist. I don't even have spare money for .......oops, said too much.

Anyhoo, I'm all for this idea.


No one can survive on welfare alone. Being a low-level pot dealer gets you your weed for free, and puts a few dollars in your pocket for Chinese food.



posted on Mar, 18 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by StigShen

Originally posted by HaveAnotherOne
reply to post by larrydavid
 


Given that it was a parking lot of a public park, it wasnt owned by a single person.

Failure once again.


It is against the law to park in a public park overnight in Phoenix. Vagrancy is also illegal.



Thank You!

So now he is breaking the law AND taking benefit from US tax payer money.



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join