To begin with, you are correct, I am not a radio engineer, or in any other way exceptionally familiar with radio technology. I certainly have no
reason to doubt your claims about your experience in the radio industry. With that, it is entirely possible that I do not understand the complete
workings of such systems, and may also be totally wrong in my theories.
However, I have done a good deal of research into HAARP/scalar technologies, and have a very good idea of exactly what they are capable of. I also
know that those who work with such technology have developed and deployed technology a full 20-50 years advanced over what is commercially available.
Much of this information has been independently corroborated by acquaintances in the military community. (William, if you would like to discuss this
via U2U, please contact me, however I am not able to post more specific information on a public thread).
The following excerpts are very interesting and may cause you to reconsider some of your previous post (granted, you may well be able to disprove this
information, and if so, I would be very interested in reading such).
Author Dr. Nick Begich, M.D. Interviewed By Kenneth Burke
> One of the most revealing documents I have found regarding these new
> technologies was produced by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Air
Force. The Air Force initiated a significant study to
> look forward into the next century and see what was possible for new
weapons. In one of the volumes published as a result
> of the study, researchers, scientists and others were encouraged to put
together forecasts of what might be possible in the
> next century. One of those forecasts shockingly revealed the following:
> "One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the
output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and
> focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow
one to prevent voluntary muscular movements,
> control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions,
interfere with both short-term and long-term
> memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set.
The most telling material about this technology came from
> Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National Security Advisory to U.S.
> Carter) and J.F. MacDonald (science advisor to U.S. President
> a professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about use of
> power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental
> documents showed how these effects might be caused, and the
> effects on human health and thinking.
> The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most
> than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the
> Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan
and test this
> use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the
> describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva.
> gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the
> which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.
> The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago,
> book by Brzezinski which he wrote while a professor at Columbia
> "Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on
> brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.
> F.MacDonald -- specialist in problems of warfare -- says
> accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes
> lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively
> power levels over certain regions of the earth...In this
> one could develop a system that would seriously impair the
> brain performance of very large populations in selected
> regions over an extended period'...No matter how deeply
> disturbing the thought of using the environment to
> manipulate behavior for national advantages , to some, the
> technology permitting such use will very probably develop
> within the next few decades."
In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force
> "The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic
> are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or
> quasi-military situations...Some of these potential uses
> include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control,
> controlling breaches of security at military installations,
> antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of
> cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to
> produce mild to severe physiological disruption or
> distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of
> individuals to function could be degraded to such a point
> they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of
> electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage
> over large areas with a single system. They are silent and
> countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One
> last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some
> value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous
The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP
> penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere.
> signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many
> order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The
> Senate set aside $15 million dollars in 1996 to develop this
ability alone --
> earth-penetrating-tomography. The problem is that the frequency
> earth-penetrating radiations is within the frequency range most
> disruption of human mental functions. It may also have profound
> migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an
> energy field to find their routes.
What better way than to covertly erect microwave towers to
blanketly transmit radio frequency radiation that affects our brain
functioning than to do it under cover of a proliferation of CELL PHONE
towers so that we may have better service and coverage?
If there were no cell phones people would become VERY suspect of the
erection of these towers. But we have been seduced into thinking we
are technologically 'challenged' if we do not use cell phones. At the
same time we have been skillfully manipulated into DEMANDING that we
have a tower on every corner so that we have full blanket coverage and