BREAKING : UN Security Council authorizes no-fly zone over Libya, page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 47 times


reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:11 PM by projectvxn
reply to post by Darth_Prime



en.wikipedia.org...
Ghaddafi was not installed by the US or any western power.

His power is a product of the toppling of a previous monarchy
edit on 17-3-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:15 PM by IsraeliGuy
Originally posted by xavi1000
Wtf is wrong with you i ask ? Why they not attack Bahrein who is killing peaceful demonstrators
Ask yourself and don't be delusional

Amusing.

Why aren't they attacking Sudan then? Or Liberia? Or Egypt, Syria, Mexico, Iran, and basically every other country that had a government that ever hurt it's own citizens?

No - this is an urgent matter. More urgent than in Bahrain.
Scrambling jets in order to bombard whole cities filled with "rebels" (labeled by Gaddafi) is alot more serious than violent riots in Bahrain. If an action will not occur, this could be a second holocaust.


And it's not like USA has already sent millions of soldiers inside Libya! So far the only thing that has happened is that the UN security council declared Libyan skies as a no fly zone, in order to prevent Gaddafi's jets slaughtering of hundreds of thousands of his own civilians. What's there to be angry about? Nothing if you're not one of those people who like to get angry at the US for no apparent reason.

Originally posted by Darth_Prime
IsraeliGuy: Understand who put these 'Dictators' in power in the first place...

This claim of yours is very low on facts. Better neglect it and move to logical thinking I suggest.

-People are sick of their tyrant psychopath so they rebel against him
--Psychopath threatens to slaughter until they are no more using jets and every other military option he has
-UN agrees to help
-Libyan streets are happy
--People on ATS are angry that the US "dares" to involve in "yet" another country's business, eventho it means hundreds of thousands of people's lives are to be saved by that involvement.

edit on 17-3-2011 by IsraeliGuy because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-3-2011 by IsraeliGuy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:25 PM by projectvxn
reply to post by xavi1000



Excuse me but NO they aren't.

A holocaust would require the DELIBERATE targeting of civilians en masse.

That is not the case in either Iraq or Afghanistan.


reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:26 PM by IsraeliGuy
Originally posted by xavi1000
Prove or gtfo ..

Nice civilized manner your conversations have.

Prove what? That Gaddafi has threatned to do so?

www.dailymail.co.uk...
www.reuters.com...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.greenewave.com...
wlcentral.org...

Voila.

Now you prove this is anything other than that, else you gtfo.

Originally posted by xavi1000
Who are the US, UK or France to make decisions what is more "urgent" ?

Apparently these are countries you can count on to stop sadistic mad men like Gaddafi from slaughtering it's own people.


reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:30 PM by xavi1000
reply to post by IsraeliGuy



Videos please of bombing cities and pictures of holocaust (that is your claims)... not links from MSM that brainwashed you
edit on 17-3-2011 by xavi1000 because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:31 PM by Immortalgemini527
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Originally posted by xavi1000
Prove or gtfo ..

Nice civilized manner your conversations have.

Prove what? That Gaddafi has threatned to do so?

www.dailymail.co.uk...
www.reuters.com...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.greenewave.com...
wlcentral.org...

Voila.

Now you prove this is anything other than that, else you gtfo.

Originally posted by xavi1000
Who are the US, UK or France to make decisions what is more "urgent" ?

Apparently these are countries you can count on to stop sadistic mad men like Gaddafi from slaughtering it's own people.


People are either dumb ,ignorant ,or just have no common sense,what is he suppose to do,let his country go into anarchy ,or have rebels run the country?
What is he suppose to do?
If hitler was alive, i gurantee this woudnt be happening.


reply posted on 17-3-2011 @ 07:35 PM by Cobaltic1978
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
WTF is the problem with you people? Gaddafi threatens to bomb his own citizens for heavens sake.

The funniest thing is if he indeed scrambles his warplanes and massacres his own people, you lot will say "yeah it's their business and we shouldn't bother them".
You guys don't care the slightest for people's lives, you only care about the fact that the oh-so-hated-US is involved.

FFS setting a no-fly zone in a country where it's leader openly threatens he will bombard his own citizens, is an act of war against the insane leader himself. NOT against the whole country. What do you say about the footages of the Libyan people celebrating this decision by the UN? Are they implanted CIA fake crowd? Psy-ops? Reptilians?

...
It takes a very biased line of thought to see these headlines and start calling US warmongers that only care for oil. No wonder everything is a conspiracy for you people! You make stupid hysteria based accusations before anything even happened.

Just for once get your head out of your ass and stop condemning anything that has a connection to the US foreign policy. They "may" be right sometimes you know.


Yeah that's right , let's put a NFZ around Israel because they have total disrespect for Palestinian lives. While we're at it, let's put a NFZ around Zimbabwe. How about Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Yemeni?

It's not about hating the U.S, it's the total hypocrisy. It is about oil, it is about money, it is about power.

Why on earth didn't the U.S go into Libya when the Lockerbie Disaster happened? It would have had more justification. It's all BS, it's all about the money man. Why do you think the U.K are so interested? It's because B.P are losing £millions every day and the government ministers are not getting the kick back they think they are entitled to.

It's not about Gadaffi. If it was he would have been wiped out years ago, and the West certainly would not have been arming him for the last forty years.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^