Originally posted by projectvxn
If we weren't broke and about to collapse under the weight of our own debt I wouldn't be against this action. We will not have boots on the ground
with exception maybe to target painters and SF forces training the rebels.
When the UN decides to slap someone it's usually US forces that lead the way...This is gonna cost us big and it will give the US government an out
for the massive inflation they've caused in the system thus far..
Broke? Got to war...
As I said, on principle, I'm not against this. But reality says this may be an ill-fated campaign.
Sorry to tell ya man, but we are currently involved in 2 separate wars, and look at the massive inflation of the dollar. Going to Libya will do
nothing to reduce inflation. In order to provide funding for any war/skirmish, the Federal reserve will be at high print, which will push more
currency into the system, thus inflating the dollar further. Is doesn't work like it did in the 40's where you could go to war to reduce inflation,
we don't take the losses of the military equipment like we used to. Going to Libya for any reason, any type of war/skirmish, will only further the
debt.