BREAKING : UN Security Council authorizes no-fly zone over Libya, page 20


Pages: <<  17    18    19    20    21    22    23  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 47 times


reply posted on 18-3-2011 @ 02:48 PM by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to
post by DSSONE



There was a change after 9-11. Gaddafi was scared, as was everyone was after 9-11. Much of the world thought we were going to nuke someone in retaliation. He helped suppress Al Qaida in response.


Al-Queda and "the west" are bed buddies and it goes back to ruso-afgan war when america aided them with anti-aircraft weapons. Al-Queda paid back the USA by attacking the twin towers and the pentagon, with american supervision of course. The people "arrested" shrotly after 9-11 were subsequently realised and now live in the middle east.

So what the hell are you talking about? Gadafi had nothing to do with al-queda!

Then after Saddam fell he made outright overtures to the UK and the US. He essentially bought, with oil money, a new relationship with the US and UK.


Maybe you are reffering to the lockerbie compensations?


Things started to sour though after he buddied up with Chavez and acted like a loon at the UN. Money can only go so far.
edit on 18/3/11 by MikeboydUS because: he


So lets use al-queda one more time to oust this pain-in-the-nwo-ass gadafhi and if that fails we declare a no-fly-zone FOR HIM ONLY while we send his aged military assets to the grave-yard and then bring him to the nwo hague to stand trial for "mass murder" eventhough there is no evidence of that anywhere; just lots of mainstream hype!


reply posted on 18-3-2011 @ 02:54 PM by MikeboydUS
reply to post by EarthCitizen07



The Mujihadeen we supported later became the Northern Alliance which fought the Taliban. Pakistani ISI supported Al Qaida.

I never said Gaddafi was related to Al Qaida, I said he suppressed them, meaning he made sure they had no presence in Libya after 9-11.



reply posted on 18-3-2011 @ 03:16 PM by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to
post by EarthCitizen07



The Mujihadeen we supported later became the Northern Alliance which fought the Taliban. Pakistani ISI supported Al Qaida.

I never said Gaddafi was related to Al Qaida, I said he suppressed them, meaning he made sure they had no presence in Libya after 9-11.


That does not make sense unless *america attacked america* and a few al-queda guys took the fall willingly to repay their debt to the cia during the russo-afghan war. Either way alquida seems to be an nwo asset and probably behind most(if not all) of the uprisings in the middle east!

I would love to see actual democracy in that area but shiites and sunnis don't get along well with each other and both don't get along well with non-muslims. Its like the protestant-catholic issue and they are too backwards, barbaric and uneducated to deal with complex decision making processes. Mainstream religion is a disease but they have not figured that out yet.


reply posted on 18-3-2011 @ 03:36 PM by General.Lee
Originally posted by CordDragonzord
It's funny how similar Obama is to Bush, hell, they even look the same to me.

Instead of taking troops out of the middle east he is sending more, great.


Read my signature! The sooner the American people realize this, the sooner we can all work toward taking back our country. I was a die hard conservative, all about the Republican party until I realized that that paradigm was no different than having a favorite sports team. You root for your team regardless of the players! I've always been a Red Wings fan and always will be, regardless of the players.

Using that mentality with politics is just naive. Once I discovered the truth about 9/11, the Patriot Act, the Bin Laden family being quietly flown out of the country on 9/11 and numerous other events, I finally woke up to the fact that everybody in Washington is on the same team! Name one Senator that isn't a millionaire? Congressman who isn't obscenely wealthy? Do those people really represent your values? They haven't a clue what your values are because they don't live your values. They don't obey your laws or abide by your rules.

One thing that takes a ton of humility is admitting that "your side" sucks as much as the opponents and breaking that hold they have on you. If we as individuals have such large egos that we can't admit we've been wrong all this time, blindly following our chosen party, then we will never be capable of seeing the Truth because we will be blinded by our ego.

If you will notice, neither the left nor the right will embrace Michael Savage because he refuses to identify with "conservative" or "liberal". Not one talk show host came to his defense when he was banned in Britain. Sean Hannity always spits out the phrase, "I may not agree with you but I'll defend your right to say it". BS! It's a talking point and warm, fuzzy thing to say but it's a damned lie! Never did he come to Michael's defense. Neither did O'Reilly, Limbaugh or anybody else.

The bottom line is, we have to think for ourselves and draw our own conclusions. Stop relying on others to validate our own opinions. It's okay to "cross check" your data and compare notes but draw your own conclusions.

Proof that they are all on the same team is simple; NONE of them will publicly address the inconsistencies of 9/11. None of them will even hint at the suspicious past of BHO and the missing time frames in his life. They will let the constitution get trampled on before they will go against the Ol' Boys Club. You can NOT tell me there aren't any senators or congressmen in Washington who have considerable suspicions about 9/11 or the roots of BHO, but do they say it? No. That's all the proof I need. They refuse to do what's right and act on their conscience. Left, Right, whatever. None of them are truly on our side.


reply posted on 18-3-2011 @ 03:45 PM by truetrigger
reply to post by incrediblelousminds



Yeah .... You are right.....
Was a tad hasty with my " ALL ".......
Pages: <<  17    18    19    20    21    22    23  >>    ^^TOP^^