It is completely conceivable that some people actually understand aviation, meteorology and chemistry without being a "shill" for some vaguely
articulated conspiracy, but I have never heard any of these people debunk the chemtrail conspiracy.
Sure you have. I debunk "chemtrails" and understand the basics needed to place questions of aviation, meteorolgy, and chemistry within the
"chemtrail" conspiracy. I have seen very few "chemtrail" believers who understand enough about the atmosphere to make an informed opinion about
how it rains, much less how and if something is being delivered into the atmosphere for nefarious reasons.
I find this whole thread, minus the people like me who are expressing similar opinions, insulting.
Surprise, some people actually enjoy learning real science without being in school, teaching, or having a job that requires that knowledge to be
continually updated. I am one of those people. I'm an Indiana housewife. I have been married to the same man for almost 31 years. I have one son,
and did not further my education because I wanted to be a full-time mother, and I raised a good son, so it was the right decision. I am a
weather-watcher, and always have been. I can name cloudforms like some people can wildflowers or birds (I can do both of those as well. And animal
tracks, fungus identification, tree identification........I happen to know a lot about a lot of fields). My hobbies are varied as well, and I'm good
at all of them.....knitting, spinning, fly tying, cooking, baking.....all of which I enjoy a lot more than getting continually insulted at ATS.
So why do I debunk? Because it is just sadly stupid that so many people on YouTube (where I started debunking 2-3 years ago) did not know what they
saw in the sky was a cloud. And it wasn't even a contrail, it was a cirrostratus undulatus cloud. Then they started in with "chemtrails" and how
I needed to learn what was up. So I researched. Quite extensively. I found lots of information on both sides of the question. And the
"chemtrail" side has no cohesion, no logic, no proof.....just pictures of contrails and clouds without any clue as to what "chem-" was being used
and how to tell that any chemical was present in what they showed. And they still have never given any kind of reasonably rational, logically
intelligent response to those two points.
Not once. And all debunkers have asked. If you don't like debunking of your opinions, perhaps you should strive to share your knowledge instead.
Not your suspicions, your suppostions, your beliefs, your contentions.....show some actual pertinent facts that bolster your view. Or something we
say that is wrong scientifically, not just something that goes against your beliefs. Debunk us. Or at least try.
But you don't and won't. You rely on calls for censorship (see Mat's previous posts). You continue to lie about us and our "jobs". You berate
us every chance given you to do it. Why? Because we know more than you on a particular topic, or have formed an opinion of our own that is counter
to your own. Thinking I am anything other than what I am (google me and you find I debunk "chemtrails", spin, knit, have dogs, cook and my
religious choice), is an outright lie, insulting, and paranoid.
Get over it. If you want to believe in something and only research one side, you will continue to be biased and close-minded. But if you post here
and most other conspiracy sites, you will be challenged to support your claims with something substantive. When you do, expect debunkers to apply
critical thinking and research your sources. If you are wrong, expect us to tell you. Actually read the cites given you from my side of the
debate. There won't be a lot of pictures, as pictures only show you can use a camera, and we understand that chemical content cannot be determined
by picture or video anyway.
Who are you? I really do not care. If you have experience, you wouldn't be on the pro-"chemtrail" side. If you have knowledge, you do not offer
it. If you have only a belief, well, expect a debate. I, and the other debunkers out there prefer to KNOW
, not just believe.