Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

U.S. Seeks UN Resolution Authorizing Strikes on Libya

page: 3
8
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
Well, Qaddafi is not too happy about this.

Libya Threatens Retaliation as U.S. Seeks UN Resolution Authorizing Strikes

This guy is crazy, obviously, who knows what he could do.




posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 05:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Juston
Well, Qaddafi is not too happy about this.

Libya Threatens Retaliation as U.S. Seeks UN Resolution Authorizing Strikes

This guy is crazy, obviously, who knows what he could do.


Yeah,he is crazy ... he just defends his country ..it's like to call Obama crazy when someone threatens US with air attacks and Obama mentions Retaliation .

When you will guys learn ..Elite is playing with you again



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 05:33 PM
link   
reply to post by xavi1000
 


I think you misinterpreted what I meant. Crazy not in the context for wanting to retaliate, but rather in his track record.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Juston
reply to post by xavi1000
 


I think you misinterpreted what I meant. Crazy not in the context for wanting to retaliate, but rather in his track record.


No problem
.. Elite will again invade country for oil behind the scenes now ..when everyone eyes is on Japan crisis ..again colateral damage ..depleted uranium ..and dead inocent civilians



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Clisen33
All the people bashing the U.S. asking the the U.N. to enter Libya are really showing their hate for the U.S. Why aren't you people foaming at the mouth over Saudi Arabia invading Bahrain with heavy armor, infantry, and air power? I have not seen one source that indicates Saudi Arabia sought out U.N. permission to invade Bahrain. But some how it seems OK that Saudi Arabia can do this and stop the uprising there and put the civilians into submission. Seriously, what is wrong with you people?


Whats wrong with you?.. have you not seen how US party leaders "helped" Iraq & Afghanistan?.. MILLIONS of people "helped" dead, displaced, DU poisoned, blown up, beat down, tortured and occupied... sounds like fun.

Libyans have zero reasons to trust the US Govt / military are there to "do the right thing".. seriously, give me one good reason the average Libyan should take the "word" of US politicians, professional liars, seriously?

Libyans aren't drunk on US patriotism/party pride who cheer for America as the "home team".. they don't follow republican / democrat clowns with cultish zeal or "support the troops".. most any "poll", if not every, you want to Google reflects most area folks dismiss the "official" 9/11 fairy tale as silly horse doo-doo, which probably means they see Iraq & Afghanistan as abhorrent nazi-like crimes.. the needless slaughter, imperial subjugation, torture and resource rape of their "brothers & sisters".

How many wars and acts of violence do US dear leader hypocrites have to lie about before they lose credibility?.. the elitists have a selfish agenda, isn't it frik'n blatantly obvious they pick & choose which "dictators" to feign "official" moral outrage about??.. how about the poor peeps in Bahrain being reduced to pablum by their dictators helicopter "air-strikes"?.. now being backed by another dictators invasion troops?.. where is the Bahrain "no fly zone"??



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by KicknAndScreamin
So let me mget this straight, Isreal is backing Qadaffi and hiring mercaneries to smash his opposition and Obama seeks to support the opposition and defy Isreals efforts? Doesn't add up. The UN already voiced opposition to the No Fly Zone and will likely not support it. So unlike the 2003 UN rejection of military action in Iraq when the US said "Screw ya, we'll go it alone" Obama will abide by the UN decision and say " Well we tried but they wouldn't let us" So it will at least look like we tried to do the right thing.


No Fly Zone approved.

news.sky.com...
I stand corrected
edit on 17-3-2011 by KicknAndScreamin because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics
 
8
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join