First radiation alert for US Midwest, Ontario, Quebec. More to come on Thurs and Fri for West coast.

page: 3
23
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:03 AM
link   
I live in California, near San Jose area. Not worried though.




posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by aboutface
reply to post by alchemist2012
 


Here`s a different screenshot. Screenshot


Yeah that one shows 164.

Thats three shots so far with high counts.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:07 AM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


not necessarily saying its fake necessarily...it's a possibility, I have a bakground in graphic design and also the darkness of the 5 looks off to me too but that could just be the shot...that's what alerted me to it but it could also be just a glitch with the software or the translation in the data collection.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:11 AM
link   
reply to post by MindSpin
 


....blizzards causing earthquakes
missed that in science class



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:11 AM
link   
I'm gettign frustrated.

I just want to TALK about it but my friends get mad.
I think the problem is that THEY THINK when I posted this same NYT article that I am trying to say that they are in California and will get radiation poisoning and die or something.

Radiation=certain death or something to them. Because of that, it seems I can't say a freaking word. We usually talk about everything but this one is a big no no.

The NEWS is frustrating I think because of the time stuff. It's dark there, light here. News on tv is slower than news on net. FEELS like 2 steps forward one back with the news.

They are still saying this is not going to be bad....but I understand it is already a level 7?
And what's bad? To me any big pollution is bad. BAD. To me Japan losing land is bad bad. To me it's all freaking bad. If it is so good we don't need to talk about it why doesn't the news cover Charlie Sheen some more?
edit on 17-3-2011 by hadriana because: can't type on this stupid little keyboard



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:18 AM
link   
reply to post by splint
 


Consider yourself lucky.

I just happened to stumble on this thread with my town all over it.

Now i'm being sure my windows are shut tonight.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:19 AM
link   
reply to post by enament
 


And don`t fprget, just before the quake they were dealing with an outbreak of avian flu and had to destroy thousands of fowl. My heart is just broken for them, dealing with loss of loved ones, their homes, no gas, electricity, food supplies and freezing night temperatures.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:19 AM
link   
reply to post by hadriana
 


Hmm, Well i live Just West of Denver. I know a few natural underground springs. I would assume they would be safe. Wish there was a way to test water in a worst case scenario.

Im also intrigued with the Denver airport tweet. I have spent days in that airport, haha. I might take a drive out there and see if things really are buzzing about. If they are...I may have to start preparing a bit. I am goign to look for other reports first..But the cams i am looking at now kind of seem normal...Very little traffic. So i am sure someone may be blowing smoke up our bums.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:23 AM
link   
reply to post by onyx718
 


I think its good to question things that look different, IMO.

Time will tell, a calm mind makes better decisions.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:30 AM
link   
reply to post by okiecowboy
 


Thank you for that, very well done.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:34 AM
link   
I think whoever came up with this forecast should take a look at a map of Canada. The radiation will hit Alaska, move south, skip over 3/4 of Canada, then hit Ontario and Quebec?


ETA: Loagun beat me to it
edit on 17-3-2011 by InvisibleAlbatross because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:39 AM
link   
watch out for them chemtrails, most likely they're comprised of radioactive compounds of the US atomic energy commission flavour


they'll tell everyone they were spraying to neutralize the affects
edit on 17-3-2011 by anumohi because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by aboutface
reply to post by alchemist2012
 


Here`s a different screenshot. Screenshot

ummm, it may just be me
but that image looks faked.

if you will take a look at the number
in the gold box, the last digit of 4 looks
like a different font and is touching the
side of the circle. if the number had been 3
digits in length, wouldn't it format in the middle
of the box like the 16 is ??? the 4 at the end
looks like it has been added after the screenshot
was taken. it appears fake to me, you judge for
yourself.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:53 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Agreed like i said i have not noticed any increased traffic near DIA



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 01:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by alchemist2012
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Agreed like i said i have not noticed any increased traffic near DIA

I just did a current refresh of the rad map
and Bakersfield showed only 13. That is a long
way from 164. While I agree the plume could have
moved inward as there seems to be no other
reporting stations in that flight path til the Denver
station.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 02:07 AM
link   
also, another note.
the web master of blackcatsystems
who run the rad map website have
appeared to recently enlarge the fonts
which show up in those reporting circles
on the map, which makes it almost
impossible to superimpose an extra
digit at the end of a reading. They
probably did this intentionally for
the sole purpose to keep people
from hoaxing fake readouts on
screenshots.

good job blackcatsystems for
staying on the ball out-thinking
the hoaxers



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Whats frustrating is there is REAL media attention given to this and not only are you all not paying attention but what does it take to get it in to your heads....how much do you think you need to get cancer 5-10 from now????????

Why are'nt you people serious enough? I'm sure if a tsunami (God forbid) came your way you will just stand there and ignore it.....and you'd probably ignore any warning beforehand.

You don't need experts to tell you what to do; try common sense!!!!!



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 02:09 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I think it was first discovered shortly after noon, so yes, the clouds would be gone from there.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 02:09 AM
link   
To all you laid back, jokers out there in the US!

We here, in the UK, thousands of miles away from Chenobyly were affected for YEARS when that happened in 1986.

Couldn't drink the water, animals couldn't be eaten, no go areas etc.

If your Government treat you like little children and don't tell you the truth, WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE as they say.



posted on Mar, 17 2011 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by minkey53
 


The sheeple people won't though and then they'll complain 10 years from now......thats if they're still around.

I don't understand ignorance.





new topics
top topics
 
23
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join