posted on Mar, 16 2011 @ 11:28 PM
hey OP did you even read the nyti,es article?
its a computer model a "forecast" and in ist own words ...The projection, by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, an arm of the United
Nations in Vienna, gives no information about actual radiation levels but only shows how a radioactive plume would probably move and disperse.
The forecast, calculated Tuesday, is based on patterns of Pacific winds at that time and the predicted path is likely to change as weather patterns
shift. ....Sunday, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission said it expected that no “harmful levels of radioactivity”
...Mr. Jaczko was asked if the meltdown of a core of one of the reactors would increase the chance of harmful radiation reaching Hawaii or the West
“I don’t want to speculate on various scenarios,” he replied. “But based on the design and the distances involved, it is very unlikely that
there would be any harmful impacts.”
and so on and so forth... get a Gieger counter or just wait for the emergency broadcast system to tell ya when to take your pill and drink your kool