It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by legalizeit
These dumbass generals think any problem can be solved with a nuke ...! what about the radiation from the nuke itself ..?? not to mention how is a nuke going to "vaporize" the radioactivity currently in the reactors ..?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
dumb retards
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
When you nuke a reactor, you use the reactor's fuel as fissile material in addition to the nuclear weapon and use it all up increasing the nuclear weapon yield.
no you don't because the reactor material isn't at critical mass and can not sustain a chain reaction.
Originally posted by quackers
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
But is it even possible? The heat from a nuclear blast would far exceed the vapourization point of uranuim by a couple of thousand degrees so would it cause a chain reaction or would it simply vapourize whatever fuel is there? Just sound like a bit like trying to put out a chip pan fire using rocket fuel.
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by Vitchilo
dumb retards
oxymoron?
I resemble that statement BTW