It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by XxRagingxPandaxX
I think I may have clearly expressed myself not ..heh heh
I agree that religion for the most part is to prevent "gnosis" (know) or self knowledge or spirituality.
I agree that it is a mechanism for control of the peeps..
the word "flock" kinda gives it away...
the catholic mass is full of the same brain washing techniques as is found in cults everywhere..
now why would GOD need to do that?
"Give us a child till he is seven and he is ours for life" _ Jesuit Maxim
Talk about contradictions...would the "creator of all" need children to be given to him for the admitted application of brain washing...
Sounds more like baal or a molock, this need for children...that's some bad religion right there....
Me, I get my spirituality in the bush..
contradiction:
question:
what did Christians do before the bible?
did they get to heaven OK?
then why do they need it now?
BTW
since Christians keep giving me bibles I feel entitled to interpret it anyway I want too.
its quite a contradiction to teach some one to read or to give a person a book
just to TELL him what it means.
If God can't make him self clearer then that
I realize that these are vague condradictions..I was hoping to stay away from the common ones...
but I feel they are at the hheart of the controvercy.
Christian may call this line of reasoning persecution but to me any GOD worth his salt would have good answers
without contradicting himself or being a hypocrite
My Father always said being a Hypcrit was the greatest sin...
there is another contradiction that isn't in the bible..enoch
they took his concept of sin which is what the fallen did TO man
and made man the victim, guilty.
just like a modern rape trial where the victim is on trial....
right
a just god that hangs a sin on just born babies
OK, now thats just going too far
Originally posted by XxRagingxPandaxX
Heres the link:www.infidels.org...
your thoughts?
In Luke (Heli) is said to be the father of Joseph, while in Matthew 1:16, Jacob was Joseph's father. The most probable explanation of this seeming contradiction is afforded by having recourse to the levirate law among the Jews, which prescribes that when a man dies childless his widow "shall not marry to another; but his brother shall take her, and raise up seed for his brother" (Deuteronomy 25:5). The child, therefore, of the second marriage is legally the child of the first (Deuteronomy 25:6). Heli having died childless, his widow became the wife of his brother Jacob, and Joseph was the offspring of the marriage, by nature the son of Jacob, but legally the son of Heli. It is likely that Matt. gives the natural, and Luke the legal descent.
(Source)
And your right, different sects can't agree on ANYTHING, catholics and baptists even have separate 10 commandments!
Because almost every war that has ever been fought has religion involved.
After reviewing historical analyses by a diverse array of specialists, we concluded that there have been few genuinely religious wars in the last 100 years. The Israel/Arab wars from 1948 to now, often painted in the media and other places as wars over religion, or wars arising from religious differences, have in fact been wars of nationalism, liberation of territory or self-defense.
right
a just god that hangs a sin on just born babies
OK, now thats just going too far
Originally posted by D377MC
The bible is not supposed to make sense to unbelivers. Speaking to his disciples, the Lord said:
'And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.'
Without the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, scriptures do indeed make little sense. Picking verses that you think are contradictory, from other website no-less as you obviously did not read the bible from cover to cover so you could share your 'discoveries' with us, is a perfect waste of time and a glaring display of superficial 'thinking'.
With regards to Christianity being a monotheistic religion, the most educated amongst you might want to google 'the divine council'. It is extremely interesting to say the least.
Originally posted by 5StarOracle
They way you have failed to interpret me, prooves me right. I didnt say that there was different ways for it to be interpreted, I said you were incapable of doing it. Whats more it apears this problem does not exist only while you study the Bible. I hope you can come to comprehend what I have just told you...
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by Annee
You wrote:
["Sorry - - - but the bible and its interpretations are open to everyone."]
This only seems to be the case, when you have some 'holy spirit" (afraid holy water just won't do).
I have this from a reliable source.