Originally posted by predator0187
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The truth is that the situation in Japan is fluid, and while the guys at MIT seeking publicity for the Institute are sitting in their staid
respectable classroom environs, the nuclear reactor 10,000 plus miles away, plant has been battered by explosions, an earthquake and a tsunami.
These are nerds with pocket protectors talking out of the side of their arse in all their pompous don't have a clue detached glory.
The situation still continues to go from bad to worse, and I would be looking to people on the ground in Japan for information not the Dungeon and
Dragons crowd.
We all know the situation is fluid, but to say that they do not know what they are talking about us a different thing. With someone of your stature
here, being well respected, for you to resort to ad hominem attacks and saying that they are too far away to know is a little daft in my opinion.
They know what's going on, they know the structure and they know physics, why would we not trust scientists from one of the most trusted institutes
around?
I will value their opinions much more than anyone on MSM.
Pred...
Have you met many people in the Academic/Scientific Community most especially those at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology? It's a rarefied
atmosphere driven by intense competition where there is a lot of pressure to over perform. They do some outstanding work, largely in giving us through
invention and development some of the technology and minds that create technology that they declare safe and beneficial (usually first for the
military) and then later for us, that isn't always so safe or so beneficial. So you might want to consider these words...vested interest.
Vested interest does not always lead to honest interest, or intelligent interest.
It might seem like an ad hominem but they do wear pocket protectors and play dungeons and dragons therefore it's really just an accurate reflection of
the state of the people you are 'trusting' for information.
These people aren't voicing their
opinion because it's a particularly well considered or informed one but to bring the Institute prestige and
to protect some of it's revenue streams. Chances are who ever designed these reactors in part or in whole are graduates of MIT.
Right now questions are focused on the safety of people in the effected Zone, what do you imagine happens when the radioactive dust settles though and
inquiries start being made about fail safes they failed, or built in structural integrity thresholds that didn't perform to expectations.
It's called egg on one's face, and they are simply attempting to get out ahead of the bad publicity this is likely to generate for a community of
physicists and engineers that they by and large produce and are the preferred purveyors of.
I’ll grant you that while in my humble opinion the Original Piece is little more than a had hominem attack on ATS members on whole that tends to
rankle the scourges in my fasces, the truth is that I would sooner consider the wide eyed musings of a little old lady from Peoria in regards to this
situation than what is essentially a Powers that Be scientific think tank like MIT.
edit on 15/3/11 by ProtoplasmicTraveler because: (no reason given)