It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Government officials admitted that it was “highly likely” the fuel rods in three separate reactors had started to melt despite repeated efforts to cool them with sea water. Safety officials said they could not rule out a full meltdown as workers struggled to keep temperatures under control in the cores of the reactors.
The Fukushima crisis now rates as a more serious accident than the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island in the US in 1979, and is second only to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, according to the French nuclear safety authority. After insisting for three days that the situation was under control, Japan urgently appealed to US and UN nuclear experts for technical help on preventing white-hot fuel rods melting.
Originally posted by ScepticallyDelicious
reply to post by FreeSpeaker
"Started" and "Full" from the way I read it, seem to be a little different from eachother. I'm no nuclear expert but unless someone knowledgable in this area can correct me I'm not seeing much of a point to jumping on this "world disaster" bandwagon that everyone is getting all riled up about.
Originally posted by ScepticallyDelicious
reply to post by FreeSpeaker
"Started" and "Full" from the way I read it, seem to be a little different from eachother. I'm no nuclear expert but unless someone knowledgable in this area can correct me I'm not seeing much of a point to jumping on this "world disaster" bandwagon that everyone is getting all riled up about.
Originally posted by XPLodER
Originally posted by predator0187
reply to post by Laurauk
No trust years and years of nuclear physics, sh!t you can be as panicked as you want but do not make other people needlessly panic as well.
Japan is asking for help which is a good thing, the more countries working on it the better, that should make people feel better alone.
Pred...
sorry to say this buddy
THE TRUST ME IM A SCIENTIST
and these reactors are 100% safe bs
is disgusting
THIS COULDNT HAPPEN HERE
is total complete bs
ITS NOT AS BAD AS YOU THINK
is total complete bs
when it comes to nuclear ANY amount of release is VERY dangerous
to say otherwise is BS
xp
Originally posted by Nicorette
Why are they building these reactors so close together that an explosion in one is causing damage to the one next to it? If they had build them only a mile away they wouldn't have quite as severe a problem.
But now the way they built this, if one reactor goes, all six are in danger of meltdown and nobody can be around their to prevent it...
sheer hubris
Originally posted by primus2012
Question:
If the containment vessels were full of water to begin with, where did that radioactive water go if the rods are exposed now? Yes I know...super heated and converted to steam...ok so where did that radioactive steam go? Yes I know the pressure build up of the steam caused explosions...ok so if those explosions didn't damage the containment vessels....see my point? How can the containment vessels be intact if they contained the water/steam to begin with?
I don't believe we're getting the true story.