BEGIN PARAPHRASE (Courtesy of Rey Rogers from GLP)
The video is very long and he has paraphrased it very well below:-
[4:29] explosion at #3 similar to #1 but more severe.
[6:45] Unit #1: extra(?) rods (fuel) were stored in the upper exploded portion: gone now.
[8:55] After such an explosion, only a 24hr monitoring can tell if the inner vessel is breached by the huge explosion. [..] Up to 0.5 percent of the
contents can be emitted and it would still be called "intact" (based on venting radioactive steam). If the steam vent works, then < 0.5 percent would
be emitted in a 24hr period, keeping us under critical pressure. At this time, according to sources, pressure being maintained through gas venting.
[11:47] This sounds nice and safe, but in fact: pressure reading and volume reading are two different things [NOTE HERE IS HIS FIRST HINT OF
DECPETION/LIES FROM OFFICIAL SECTORS] We need to know how much of the volume has decreased, not just the pressure. It is only when you have that
figure, that you know how much material has been emitted to the atmosphere.
[14:20] In other words, in the vessel, pressure is rising and may explode.
[16:00] We did see a hydrogen explosion, not a controlled release, rather, leakage from containment vessel is suspected, but the explosion occurred
OUTSIDE the vessel not within the vessel which would be worse. [...] The design permits us to add nitrogen to cool. Unfortunately when you vent gas
for pressure, you lose the nitrogen cooling. Also venting may allow oxygen to enter the containment vessel. This is hypothetical, but if you have
hydrogen leave and oxygen enter, risk of containment vessel exploding increases. Not enough data at this time as to this.
[19:00] But I would like to ask, did anyone think Hydrogen explosion could occur in the containment building? [because] Hydrogen does explode. [HE IS
HINTING THAT THE UNEXPECTED MAY HAPPEN AS IT HAS HAPPENED ALREADY]
[20:00] To cool, you need pumps, water and electricity. [...] These are all haphazard at this time, only partially available [...] if we can keep the
rods submerged, then we can see this getting better. [...] But these ideas of sufficient water and pump-electricity are at this time, haphazard.
Question: Is the cooling process happening in fact?
[24:00] These are the questions the press needs to ask [HE SAYS TO ASK THESE QUESTIONS].
[25:00] Cooling with seawater seems to have disrupted. Also the electricity systems may have been damaged. As a result, these difficulties are
occurring in several plants. We are seeing multiple such-failures. [26:00] At some plants the generators have been able to start and are working. But
in others, the generators have failed to start. In other words, there are multiple factors affecting the whole very very severe situation.
[27:00] Statements by the officials are that ample supplies of water have been secured so we are hoping the rods are submerged but there is question
as to this. [28:00] the reason I am not being precise is that there is some question as to the monitors that check the water levels are actively
working or if they are faulty. However the announcements are admitting this, the answer is that there are other ways being used to gauge the water
level. According to these other parameters there is reason to say that the rods are immersed. I am not saying the situation is reversed or nearing
closure. More correct would be to say we are in a very delicate situation.
(visit the link for the full news article)