It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As far as I understand it the moment they decided to pump them with seawater the plants themselves are indefinitely offline. The seawater does something that makes em unrecoverable.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Originally posted by SLAYER69
The question then becomes what to do next?
Will the Japanese finally admit straight out it's a freaking disaster and start dumping graphite and whatever else is needed on the core and buildings? The Russians [After a few days of farting around] started dumping ton after ton and entombed the reactor.
Maybe it's time for the Japanese to admit defeat and get on with it already?
One of the big problems facing the Japanese is they are actually dependent on those reactors for their electricity.
They are already having to ration power through planned staged rolling black outs and that's with 1/10th of the Grid that's destroyed not even requesting power.
Economically the impact to industry could be huge if these reactors can't be got up and running as it could be months or years until replacement plants nuclear, coal, oil or otherwise can be brought online.
If they lose this plant completely and any one or more of the others, Japan is probably looking at rolling brown outs for months if not years as power is rationed. Considering the extent of the destruction to the infrastructure and homes the power situation could also impact and significantly slow recovery.
Right now they are gambling that they can save these plants and get them back up and running somehow sometimes soon, failure to do so, represents another disaster in it's own right, when it comes to supplying the nation's power grid.
Let's just hope for everyone's sake they have a way to pull this off, and the gamble doesn't end with the complete meltdown of the reactors and yet another catostrophe for the people of Japan.
Just recently a report was released that studied coal power in the US and tis death toll. Every year it was estimated that 13,000 people die as a result of the pollutants. This is a conservative figure and it was constructed AFTER they installed about 130 coal scrubbers after 2000. The earlier study in 2001 estimated about 25,000 deaths per year. So just between 1995 and 2005 in the US alone we're probably in the neighborhood of 220,000 deaths due to coal power pollutants. Keep in mind this is probably conservative. Another thing to consider is that the radioactive emissions from coal power is magnitudes higher than from nuclear power. Some numbers I've heard are 100 to 1. This is during normal operation for those living in vicinity of the plant. Coal is very dirty!
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Alina
.................
The new data, based on Belarus national cancer statistics, predicts approximately 270,000 cancers and 93,000 fatal cancer cases caused by Chernobyl. The report also concludes that on the basis of demographic data, during the last 15 years, 60,000 people have additionally died in Russia because of the Chernobyl accident, and estimates of the total death toll for the Ukraine and Belarus could reach another 140,000.
Chernobyl death toll grossly underestimated
They haven't contained the Japanese Nuclear disaster,and its obviously getting worse.
If the spent rods start to burn, huge amounts of radioactive material would be released into the atmosphere and would disperse across the Northern Hemisphere.
Unlike the reactors, spent fuel pools are not—repeat not—housed in any sort of hardened or sealed containment structures. Rather, the fuel rods are packed tightly together in pools of water that are often several stories above ground.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Alina
My point is that NO ONE on this thread,believes your argument,or your statement. If this isnt as bad,why have they ALREADY upgraded this to a 6,and THEY still haven't got containment in multiple plants? You do realize its a fluid situation? I just dont get how people wish to believe,or can spread disinfo,that this ISNT going to be worse then ANY other Nuclear disaster,ever since? Thats Ignorance. DENY IGNORANCE.
Originally posted by Itop1
reply to post by Alina
I live in England and they are saying the same as France, what TV channel do you watch, you seem to be behind on times, things have got a lot more serious since the UK said "everything was fine".... which i admit they did, and so did the japanese government, but even now they are admiting its getting to a critical stage now where the radiation levels at one of the reactor is so high workers are in too high of a danger to do anything more.
your theory of radioactive particles not being in the atmosphere are totally untrue, this has been proved time and time again that radioactive particles are already airborne.... but its not too serious yet unless they totally lose control which the governments around the world are now fearing, at the start it was 1 reactor which did NOT use MOX.... and then it was in no danger of being on a chernobyl scale or worse, but since then things have become a lot lot worse.
It's not that the radiation isn't airborne, it's that the radiation isn't being ferried by carbon gas and being burned into the air like a cauldron.