It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
The question then becomes what to do next?
Will the Japanese finally admit straight out it's a freaking disaster and start dumping graphite and whatever else is needed on the core and buildings? The Russians [After a few days of farting around] started dumping ton after ton and entombed the reactor.
Maybe it's time for the Japanese to admit defeat and get on with it already?
Originally posted by Alina
I don't think most people understand that meltdown != Chernobyl.
Even a complete meltdown of the plant would not cause the same damage.
The 20km potential danger zone is still nothing compared to the Tsunami.
Originally posted by meathed
Yes it does its a thousand times and, have you been reading much?
A tsunami doesnt give you cancer, a tsunami doesnt make men and women infertile, a tsunami doesnt cause birth defects, miscarriages for generations in the future. A tsunami doesnt leave radioavice fallout all over the land and over the sea. A tsunami doesnt put several types of radiation like strontium 90 into the atmospere, that will rain down on us for hundreds of years causing cancers like leukemia in children.
You can rebuild on the same land after a tsunami
You can plant crops and fish the ocean after a tsunami
YOU CANT after a nuclear disaster.
Get it
This event exposed the graphite moderator components of the reactor to air, causing them to ignite. The resulting fire sent a plume of radioactive fallout into the atmosphere and over an extensive geographical area, including Pripyat. The plume drifted over large parts of the western Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, and Northern Europe. Large areas in Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia were evacuated, and over 336,000 people were resettled. According to official post-Soviet data,[1][2] about 60% of the fallout landed in Belarus.
Originally posted by meathed
reply to post by Alina
Car accidents?
Im sorry but this is not chernobyl, Theres more reactors, more stored spent rods. More BANG for your buck.
You can show me all the paper work on this that you like, but the facts remain facts, and this is unprecidented in human history. This event will rewrite the books your quoting from in a day or to. so come back with your quotes then.
Originally posted by Alina
Originally posted by meathed
reply to post by Alina
Car accidents?
Im sorry but this is not chernobyl, Theres more reactors, more stored spent rods. More BANG for your buck.
You can show me all the paper work on this that you like, but the facts remain facts, and this is unprecidented in human history. This event will rewrite the books your quoting from in a day or to. so come back with your quotes then.
Speaking of facts, can you actually show me a single one?
Can you actually explain to me how it is even actually possible to cause as much damage as Chernobyl?
Can you give technical information to differentiate the two?
Can you explain the difference between Chernobyl and this event at all for that matter?
Do you understand that "meltdown" is not a generic damage measurement?
The only evidence he needs to provide is this fact
Reactor 3 had on top of the containment vessel a storage room for spent rods. These rods were plutonium based. These plutonium based rods come from old nuclear war heads, and was done to bring back the nuclear weapons on earth. Only this reactor alone is more damaging as Chernobyl. Because they were blown sky high if you ask me
p75oZDwmew0
Or if its reactor 4 then the were exposed since the roof was also blown off