It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 1997, former U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen made the following statement:
"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts."
Cohen was talking about longitudinal EM wave interferometers (LWI) technology (also known as “Tesla howitzers”). LWI waves can effortlessly pass through the ocean and earth. Experts claim LWI waves can in fact pass through the earth and emerge on the other side. The United States and Russia have possessed this technology for decades.
Cohen would have you believe it is a technology that only terrorists would use. It depends on who you would call a terrorist.
In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald, associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President’s Science Advisory Committee. MacDonald published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes, including “earthquake engineering” (he also wrote about weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques).
“The revealed secrets surprised legislators,” writes Dr. Nick Begich. “Would an inquiry into the state of the art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may find out that technologies developed out of the HAARP experiments in Alaska could deliver on Gordon MacDonald’s vision because leading-edge scientists are describing global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems, but also as an electrical system.”
Originally posted by CyberFawkes1105
The statement is at least a minor confirmation that the technology exists. If the government acknowledged that a technology exists and that forces opposed to them are trying to develop it, it only makes sense that they would try and beat them to it.
A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we've learned in the intelligence community, we had something called -- and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
From: Konstantinos Dennis Papadopoulos
Subject: Re: HAARP question
Date: Mar 13, 2011 4:33 PM
HAARP cannot do anything like that. Its power is electromagnetic like a radio station. Radio stations put out more than 1000000 time more power than HAARP and do not create earthquakes. In any way HAARP has not operated during the last month
ELF signals generated by the HAARP heater are also simultaneously observed at a nearby ground‐based site, allowing a comparison of the ELF power in the Earth‐ionosphere waveguide versus that detected on DEMETER. The estimated values of power onboard DEMETER at different frequencies range from 0.32W to 4W, while the values of power estimated from a ground receiver at a distance of 36 km from HAARP range from 2.71W to 4.22W.
Hey CyberFawkes1105, what you seriously need to do is look up a member called Bedlam and read everything he has posted about HAARP. He has waged pretty much a one man war against all the stupid HAARP causes earthquakes, heamaroids etc threads, and he's really worth listening to. He is an expert in some applicable field, radar or something. I think he's given up trying to convince people to be sensible about the subject. He hasn't entered any of these silly HAARP threads in a long while.
Originally posted by kwakakev
Here in Australia we have at least two, possibly three HAARP sites.
There is some evidence to indicate that HAARP had a part to play in the recent Chile and Haiti earthquakes as well as the boxing day tsunami
From: Konstantinos Dennis Papadopoulos To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: HAARP question Date: Mar 13, 2011 4:33 PM HAARP cannot do anything like that. Its power is electromagnetic like a radio station. Radio stations put out more than 1000000 time more power than HAARP and do not create earthquakes. In any way HAARP has not operated during the last month DP
A high power transmitter and antenna array operating in the High Frequency (HF) range. The transmitter is capable of delivering up to 3.6 million Watts to an antenna system consisting of 180 crossed dipole antennas arranged as a rectangular, planar array.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
The threats that Cohen spoke about may have been false, but chemical and biological weapons, Ebola viruses, etc., sure aren't.
And something tells me DARPA's "small-scale earthquake machine" isn't a figment of their imagination either.
Russians have had scalar weapons probably since they were first tested on the USS Thresher in 1963, if not earlier.
To try and deny that the U.S. hasn't successfully competed with Soviet scalar weapon technology over the last half century is preposterous.
And to ignore the fact that Tesla claimed that he could "split the world in two" with his technology over 100 years ago is equally insulting. Hell, Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower was probably responsible for overshooting Peary on his way to Antarctica and obliterating Tunguska with 100 billion watts!
But HAARP has less power than an AM/FM clock radio? C'mon...
If you want to argue that the owners/controllers of the U.S. government aren't the real global mafia, that's one thing.
But to say they don't have the technical capabilities to own the weather and most of nature herself is quite another.
Originally posted by subject x
But the quote is, never the less, being taken out of context pretty regularly to try and "prove" that HAARP can cause earthquakes and such, when the simple fact is that it can't.
That's a totally different technology, which has nothing to do with HAARP.
Yeah... When it comes to scalar weapons, no matter what source is used, it all comes back to Col. Tom Bearden. I have yet to find a credible physicist who does not think that Bearden is plain wrong and using a lot of junk science. Some think he's outright nuts.
That's another pretty far fetched theory that has yet to be proven. Not to say Tesla wasn't brilliant, but I don't think he could do a lot of what he claimed. He was great at outside the box conceptualizing, but most of his stuff lack the work to back it up.
I have yet to see verifiable facts to prove that they [HAARP] have those technical capabilities.
The best I've seen is the potential to slightly affect the weather.