reply to post by Akragon
As the YouTube video pointed out, there were many versions of the Bible. As remember by the time the King James version was authorized, it could mean
death if you were caught with anything else. Remember that God is no respector of persons. He certainly is not concerned with what book you read
about him. The important fact is that you believe in him. No two humans think and process information exactly alike. So even about Christians in
the same church there will be differing levels of comprehension and different interpretations. So really we all have our own religion (for lack of a
Hell was something devised as a way to control the people. Do this or else type of thing. Jesus never taugh about it. He only spoke of a loving and
caring Father. A Father of all people, regardless of nationality, race or religion. Jesus also never wrote on anything but the dirt because he
wanted to avoid relic worship by his followers and once something is written on paper it becomes static and dead. He taught that truth must be alive
and active and change with the times. Due to this is Apostles did not begin writing about him till almost 10 years after his death.
The Gospel by Mark. John Mark wrote the earliest (excepting the notes of Andrew), briefest, and most simple record of Jesus' life. He presented the
Master as a minister, as man among men. Although Mark was a lad lingering about many of the scenes which he depicts, his record is in reality the
Gospel according to Simon Peter. He was early associated with Peter; later with Paul. Mark wrote this record at the instigation of Peter and on the
earnest petition of the church at Rome. Knowing how consistently the Master refused to write out his teachings when on earth and in the flesh, Mark,
like the apostles and other leading disciples, was hesitant to put them in writing. But Peter felt the church at Rome required the assistance of such
a written narrative, and Mark consented to undertake its preparation. He made many notes before Peter died in A.D. 67, and in accordance with the
outline approved by Peter and for the church at Rome, he began his writing soon after Peter's death. The Gospel was completed near the end of A.D. 68.
Mark wrote entirely from his own memory and Peter's memory. The record has since been considerably changed, numerous passages having been taken out
and some later matter added at the end to replace the latter one fifth of the original Gospel, which was lost from the first manuscript before it was
ever copied. This record by Mark, in conjunction with Andrew's and Matthew's notes, was the written basis of all subsequent Gospel narratives which
sought to portray the life and teachings of Jesus.
The Gospel of Matthew. The so-called Gospel according to Matthew is the record of the Master's life which was written for the edification of Jewish
Christians. The author of this record constantly seeks to show in Jesus' life that much which he did was that "it might be fulfilled which was spoken
by the prophet." Matthew's Gospel portrays Jesus as a son of David, picturing him as showing great respect for the law and the prophets. The Apostle
Matthew did not write this Gospel. It was written by Isador, one of his disciples, who had as a help in his work not only Matthew's personal
remembrance of these events but also a certain record which the latter had made of the sayings of Jesus directly after the crucifixion. This record by
Matthew was written in Aramaic; Isador wrote in Greek. There was no intent to deceive in accrediting the production to Matthew. It was the custom in
those days for pupils thus to honor their teachers. Matthew's original record was edited and added to in A.D. 40 just before he left Jerusalem to
engage in evangelistic preaching. It was a private record, the last copy having been destroyed in the burning of a Syrian monastery in A.D. 416.
Isador escaped from Jerusalem in A.D. 70 after the investment of the city by the armies of Titus, taking with him to Pella a copy of Matthew's notes.
In the year 71, while living at Pella, Isador wrote the Gospel according to Matthew. He also had with him the first four fifths of Mark's narrative.
The Gospel by Luke. Luke, the physician of Antioch in Pisidia, was a gentile convert of Paul, and he wrote quite a different story of the Master's
life. He began to follow Paul and learn of the life and teachings of Jesus in A.D. 47. Luke preserves much of the "grace of the Lord Jesus Christ" in
his record as he gathered up these facts from Paul and others. Luke presents the Master as "the friend of publicans and sinners." He did not formulate
his many notes into the Gospel until after Paul's death. Luke wrote in the year 82 in Achaia. He planned three books dealing with the history of
Christ and Christianity but died in A.D. 90 just before he finished the second of these works, the "Acts of the Apostles." As material for the
compilation of his Gospel, Luke first depended upon the story of Jesus' life as Paul had related it to him. Luke's Gospel is, therefore, in some ways
the Gospel according to Paul. But Luke had other sources of information. He not only interviewed scores of eyewitnesses to the numerous episodes of
Jesus' life which he records, but he also had with him a copy of Mark's Gospel, that is, the first four fifths, Isador's narrative, and a brief record
made in the year A.D. 78 at Antioch by a believer named Cedes. Luke also had a mutilated and much-edited copy of some notes purported to have been
made by the Apostle Andrew.
The Gospel of John. The Gospel according to John relates much of Jesus' work in Judea and around Jerusalem which is not contained in the other
records. This is the so-called Gospel according to John the son of Zebedee, and though John did not write it, he did inspire it. Since its first
writing it has several times been edited to make it appear to have been written by John himself. When this record was made, John had the other
Gospels, and he saw that much had been omitted; accordingly, in the year A.D. 101 he encouraged his associate, Nathan, a Greek Jew from Caesarea, to
begin the writing. John supplied his material from memory and by reference to the three records already in existence. He had no written records of his
own. The Epistle known as "First John" was written by John himself as a covering letter for the work which Nathan executed under his direction.
edit on 22-4-2011 by UB2120 because: Missed a date
edit on 22-4-2011 by UB2120 because: (no reason given)