It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NEW Jerusalem UFO Video Emerges

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:32 PM
link   


See how the posts are lit up on the sides facing the light source.

Why does this effect not exist in the video?




posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by hotrice
 


The light is FAKE, I already demonstrated how they made the light flashes... Watch this video and take note of what happens at 1:30:



The corners of the frame are dark because they added a solid color layer to act as the flash of light, and they feathered the edges of the solid color which was the shape of a circle, and it created the dark corners.

The light is FAKE. Not real.... If you can't see that then you need to get out in the real world more often and stop watching sci-fi movies that use fake like all the time.
edit on 13-3-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)


It can be faked, fine. That still does not prove that this is a hoax.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Planet teleX


See how the posts are lit up on the sides facing the light source.

Why does this effect not exist in the video?


Your comparing a photo taken by a Nikon D100 to a photo taken by a cell phone. In my opinion the foreground is well lit because of the background light source and the poor white-balance control of the camera phone.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by hotrice
 


With cheap lenses there really is no gradient.


Using your logic then the flash would look like this:



Why are the edges only dark when there IS a flash? They should ALWAYS be darker!
This was not filmed on a phone, this wasn't filmed at all.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by hotrice
No further information.


So.. where is the dome in this version?




posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by hotrice
 


Why would you post a copy of the video instead of the original?
Are you related to AlienDisclosureGroup and promoting their copy
instead of the original footage dated on March 5, 2011?
There is already some information about this footage but is
in arabic language by the videographer why don't you do a new search.
A better idea, let's see who is the smart one who finds the original video.

This thread will be closed as soon as the moderator awakes from the nap.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:44 PM
link   
reply to post by hotrice
 


Ok, WHO ARE YOU? Why are you trying to convince people a FAKE UFO is real?

The UFO sighting was already proven to be fake.... anyone claiming it is real is a liar and a hoaxer and a fool. We already know this UFO is fake, so YOU have to prove it is real.

There is NOTHING real about this sighting... If you think the flashes of light are real then you need to leave UFOlogy ASAP.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:44 PM
link   
That's all well and good, however, your end result looks nothing like the original.

Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by hotrice
 


The light is FAKE, I already demonstrated how they made the light flashes... Watch this video and take note of what happens at 1:30:



The corners of the frame are dark because they added a solid color layer to act as the flash of light, and they feathered the edges of the solid color which was the shape of a circle, and it created the dark corners.

The light is FAKE. Not real.... If you can't see that then you need to get out in the real world more often and stop watching sci-fi movies that use fake like all the time.
edit on 13-3-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by free_spirit
reply to post by hotrice
 


Why would you post a copy of the video instead of the original?
Are you related to AlienDisclosureGroup and promoting their copy
instead of the original footage dated on March 5, 2011?
There is already some information about this footage but is
in arabic language by the videographer why don't you do a new search.
A better idea, let's see who is the smart one who finds the original video.

This thread will be closed as soon as the moderator awakes from the nap.



What difference does it make what video I post? I subscribe to ADG on Twitter, and that's how I came across this video.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by hotrice
 


Ok, WHO ARE YOU? Why are you trying to convince people a FAKE UFO is real?

The UFO sighting was already proven to be fake.... anyone claiming it is real is a liar and a hoaxer and a fool. We already know this UFO is fake, so YOU have to prove it is real.

There is NOTHING real about this sighting... If you think the flashes of light are real then you need to leave UFOlogy ASAP.



LOL what? Are you insinuating that I have an agenda because I am trying to prove that this video is real? I have a question for you then. How old are you? Making petty personal attacks and getting angry because the discussion doesn't go your way isn't very mature.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:50 PM
link   
reply to post by hotrice
 

I'm not referring to the flash in this picture but to the posts. Look at the surface- it is shiny and reflective. All surfaces will exhibit this on their side facing a bright flash. It's real-world lighting that will be picked up by any camera.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Planet teleX
reply to post by hotrice
 


With cheap lenses there really is no gradient.


Using your logic then the flash would look like this:



Why are the edges only dark when there IS a flash? They should ALWAYS be darker!
This was not filmed on a phone, this wasn't filmed at all.


There is nothing abstract here, so I am not using logic to speculate. I am commenting based on my personal experience. This is how dark corners look like:

i.ytimg.com...

(a picture I found on Google)



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:55 PM
link   
Ha, yea he's really a member of the super duper top secret black ops who have infiltrated this website. We've been had!


Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by hotrice
 


Ok, WHO ARE YOU? Why are you trying to convince people a FAKE UFO is real?

The UFO sighting was already proven to be fake.... anyone claiming it is real is a liar and a hoaxer and a fool. We already know this UFO is fake, so YOU have to prove it is real.

There is NOTHING real about this sighting... If you think the flashes of light are real then you need to leave UFOlogy ASAP.




posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by backpage
 


With all due respect, your opinion is worthless.

When I added flashes to the original many people couldn't even tell which flashes I added because they looked so similar. So I know they look similar. Any bits that don't look similar can easily be made to look similar.

You are just in denial.

Here I slowed down the first flash in the new video:



I feel really sorry for anyone who thinks the above light is real....

Brighter lights make darker shadows... However, all the shadows are decreased in this video! It is so fake, I can't believe people actually buy this CRAP.

ITS A HOAX.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 06:59 PM
link   





I played around with the original video.
Stabilized image a little,
brightness
contrast
and some slow motion for the fast parts

:|
David Grouchy

[Original music by Boston Dave]


edit on 13-3-2011 by davidgrouchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 07:01 PM
link   
NEW Fake Jerusalem Video Emerges...

That should of been the title of the thread.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 07:01 PM
link   
reply to post by hotrice
 

Yes there is graduation of light in your picture.

...hence the dark corners.


With cheap lenses there really is no gradient.

Make up your mind.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 07:03 PM
link   
I'm in two minds on this one, the flash could be CGI, but then again, maybe not. I have taken video of lightening, and stills pulled from the video clearly show areas in the foreground well lit, even if the strike was say half a mile away. This most definitely is not a static picture, at 00:19 - 00:20 you can see traffic moving in the bottom right hand corner just in that dark stretch between the two smaller bushes, looks like headlights to me....having said that, CGI can be inserted over stock video I guess.



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 07:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by hotrice
LOL what? Are you insinuating that I have an agenda because I am trying to prove that this video is real?


Yes.

Every video of the Jerusalem UFO has been confirmed FAKE. Anyone trying to push the agenda that it is real is highly suspect. That includes YOU.


Originally posted by hotrice
I have a question for you then. How old are you?


...age doesn't matter.


Originally posted by hotrice
Making petty personal attacks and getting angry because the discussion doesn't go your way isn't very mature.


You think I am personally attacking you? HAHA, get real.. Anyone who thinks the stupid fake Jerusalem UFOs are real, are highly suspect. I and many other have already proven the Jerusalem UFOs are fake, so anyone who comes forward trying to insist they are real are highly suspect. YOU could possibly be the HOAXER. Did you not think of that?

Of course I am angry. I spent more time than anyone studying this Jerusalem HOAX, and when kids come along and ignore logic and evidence and insist it is real with absolutely no proof or logic to back up their claims... it is very annoying.
edit on 13-3-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2011 @ 07:47 PM
link   
Ok, I stabilized the video:



To me, this proves the video is fake.

The foreground objects ( the fence, bush, other objects closest to the camera ) and the background objects ( horizon, UFO, city lights ) are locked together perfectly even though the camera is moving left, right, up, and down. If the camera is actually moving left, right, up, and down, this should cause the PARALLAX EFFECT to be visible between the foreground and background objects. However, there is ZERO movement between the foreground and background, which means ZERO PARALLAX.

This proves to me that the camera shake is FAKE.

They filmed the original video on a tripod or stand with zero shake, causing zero parallax. That made it easier to add the fake UFO. Then they added the fake camera shake for effect, and totally ignored parallax.

This video is so horribly fake that it is disgusting.
edit on 13-3-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join