It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
so all those people who flagged this topic and gave the op stars actually understand all what is written in the PDF file? If that's the case bravo to all ATs members , I envy you guys cause I cant understand anything in the PDF huhuhu
Originally posted by Le Colonel
I read the first couple pages, not really understanding any of it. I can read some technical stuff, but it seemed more like gibberish, also Planet x, Nibiru is mentioned in the first or second paragraph. I cant believe this is legit.
Dont get me wrong, im all for a good conspiracy, but ...
sry, nibiru is not mentioned, planet x and nemesis, or tycheedit on 12-3-2011 by Le Colonel because: (no reason given)
We must conclude that not even the hypothesis of Planet X is a viable one to explain the anomalous increase of the lunar eccentricity of eq. (1).
I guess we are back in the theory that "our" Moon, is an alien space station and maybe their owners are just changing the settings.
In fact, I just did the math, and that works out to 8.4 millimetres per year.
In the 38.7 years they've been observing this, the moon's apogee has gained a sixth of a metre while the perigee has lost as much.
Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by Trublbrwing
Nice. Intriguing find.
Now, specifically, what they "know" is that the eccentricity of the moon is increasing - that is, the moon's orbit is gradually getting more and more elliptical. And, nothing seems to be able to account for it either long-term or without other effects that we do not observe.
ETA: MoosKept240, your wish is my commandedit on 12-3-2011 by CLPrime because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MoosKept240
So uh, anyway anyone can dumb all that down a little..... I am having a hard time understanding what they are saying.