posted on Mar, 12 2011 @ 06:25 PM
See my post in the other thread, here: www.abovetopsecret.com...
It is certain that at this point, THINGS ARE MUCH WORSE than is being reported.
I hate being the layman to go against the word of "experts" but unfortunately there is too much history of cover-up and downplaying to believe that
anything less than Chernobyl 2 has occurred at this point.
There is plenty of information on the 'net about reactors, their design, operation, safety systems etc.. that make alarm bells ring when they said
that the explosion was due to a fault with cooling the primary containment. That is totally bogus - the primary containment is not cooled - it is not
even filled with water!
When they reported (read my posts after the one I linked to in the other thread) that the cooling circuit to the reactor failed, the only image in my
mind was that of pressure build-up in the reactor pressure vessel going far beyond design limits, and resulting in catastrophic failure of both it,
the primary containment and the secondary containment building.
When you consider also that earlier they had been successfully maintaining pressure of the secondary containment to safe limits having vented the
reactor coolant to keep it within limits, the sudden and unexpected failure of the secondary containment building can only be the result of an
explosion of the pressure vessel.
In other words, Chernobyl 2 *has* occurred, despite all the news reports. Just look at the design of a BWR reactor and its layout and you will see
that what they are saying in the MSM doesn't make sense.
edit on 12-3-2011 by mirageofdeceit because: (no reason given)