It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Souljah
If the Muslims can move to one of the dozens of other countries they've already conquered and practice their religion there, why don't the Catholics do the Same - and LEAVE America, which they Forcefully Colonized, and LEAVE Australia also? And while they are Leaving, they can LEAVE also the Middle East, for their Presence is not helping to Increase the PEACE.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
If the Christians leave America and Australia, will the muslims leave Indonesia, North Africa, Persia, Syria, Palestine, etc...?
The populations have already been replaced.
Right now it's about stopping even more countries from have their populations replaced by muslims.
World's Top Despots
Adolph Hitler
Joseph Stalin
Mao Zedong
Tamerlane
Ivan the Terrible
Robespierre
Francois Duvalier
Nicolae Ceausescu
Idi Amin
Pol Pot
Originally posted by Souljah
Errr, Islam was Born is Persia, Syria, Palestine - you are hanging to Straws here Ace. Problem is, that you know I'm right, and you know that Islamic Religion is not as Evil as you or the Norweigan Politican are Trying really Best to make it look.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
By the 900s Syria was still half Christian and they still acoount for 10% of the population today.
Originally posted by Souljah
By 1492 North and South America Were 100% Indian - wan't to check the Percentage of Native Indian Population Today?
Originally posted by AceOfBase
It's 4.1% in the US.
census.gov
In 1453 Constantinople was 100% Christian.
How many Christians are there today?
Originally posted by Souljah
Are you Comparing a Conquest of a Single City to the Systematic Elimination - Genocide, War, Deliberate infection and Exploitation - of almost 100 Million Indians in Americas?
That is not Comparable.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Do you have reliable links on that 100 million figure because I've seen numbers which are significantly lower and most died due to disease not deliberate extermination.
Encyclopedia of North American Indians
Originally posted by Souljah
.............
Aha ofcourse. And the Fact that the Christianity along with their EMPIRES have Conquered almos the entire WORLD, does not bother you I guess. The Fact that Christianity commited a Genocide upon Native Indian Population in Americas does not Bother you.
.............
Originally posted by Muaddib
First of all, that is part of the past, you don't see any Christian nation proclaiming that they will conquer the world or destroy by cutting the heads and killing all those that don't want to become Christian.
Originally posted by Souljah
Well I see Christian so-called Leaders of Democratic Societies Bombing the Crap out of Muslim Population, just because it Suits perfectly their War on Terrorism Scenario.
"Killing an adulterer, even if he is a Muslim is OK. Killing a 'kufar' (non-believer) who is fighting you is OK. Killing a 'kufar' for any reason you can say it is OK even if there is no reason for it," he told an audience.
London's Central Criminal Court was told Friday that Hamza -- who was born in Egypt but is British by marriage -- said Islamic beliefs should be spread with the help of the sword in the September 1999 talk, a video tape of which was played to jurors.
Hamza, the 47-year-old former imam of Finsbury Park mosque in north London, faces a total of 15 charges, including nine of "soliciting to murder".
Originally posted by Muaddib
Souljah.....your so beloved revolutionary/terrorists/freedom fighters in Iraq are killing more Iraqi civilians than they are killing coalition forces.
Iraqi Bodycount
- US-led forces killed 37% of civilian victims.
- Anti-occupation forces/insurgents killed 9% of civilian victims.
- Air strikes caused most (64%) of the explosives deaths.
- Children were disproportionately affected by all explosive devices but most severely by air strikes and unexploded ordnance (including cluster bomblets).
I have never seen you bash at the fricken radical Islamists friends of yours who killed millions of Africans since 1983 til 2003, and during their second jihad killed about 450,000 black non-Muslims in Africa from 2003 til 2005, and the figure could be higher now....but i am sure you will try to find a way to place the blame for this on the U.S. again.....
Originally posted by Muaddib
First of all, that is part of the past...
There is nothing which we can do about the past, but we have to worry about the future.
I would agree that there are many Muslim people that do not accept the extreme side of islam, but according to the Quran these same people are not Muslim. When Jihad is called upon any non-Muslim nations all Muslims are supposed to obey and do their part in Jihad to spread the religion by all means.
I do not believe any religion has "the right to make people submit to it by force or kill these people that do not accept such religion", or any other extreme views any religion might have against non-believers.
ShadowXIX is actually right, Muhammed was a murderer, and he himself broke many of the same "laws that supposedly" the Archangel Michael gave him.
What i do believe is that Islam should change to truly be a religion of acceptance instead of trying to hide the truth about the inception and the history of Islam.
Originally posted by Souljah
I beg to Differ.
Originally posted by Souljah
On the Contrary - I have Tried to shed Light on the Massacres in Africa, conducted by Muslim Radicals, who call themselves Liberators, only because they see what US can do and get away with it.
Originally posted by SouljahSo if you want to Talk about Africa, do you know WHO supplies these people tons of small arms fire, the REAL Weapons of Mass Destruction, that kill slowly the African People?
Originally posted by Souljah
It is not that I just Want to Blame US yet again - but all Roads always lead back to the Empire; the Global Pax Americana. It is not try to Find these Facts - they are RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU! But majority of the People selectivly Ignores them.
Like You.
Originally posted by Souljah
You seem to Ignore and/or Support everything about Bush Administration.
For you, they have dont NOTHING Wrong at all. For you they are sent from Heaven Above to this Planet, to SAVE US from the Evils of Islamic Terrorism!
Originally posted by Souljah
I guess that the Headlines you find today in Press do not mean anything to you and your fanatical Bush Supporters friends, with which you have an alliance to finnaly put Souljah into the Corner and stop him spreading his Islamo-Fascist-Revolutionary-Anti-American-Propaganda-Crap.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Check how many coalition forces your buddies the insurgents have killed, and then check how many Iraqis your buddies the insurgents have killed. Try to see who have your insurgents friends killed the most, you keep saying your buddies the insurgents care for the Iraqi people don't you? Why have they killed more Iraqis than coalition forces?...and why is it that Iraqi citizens have attacked killed and captured/given information about some of your insurgent friends?.....
You are really something else Souljah, I knew you would try to find a way to blame the U.S. for what Radical Islamists have been doing....
Yes souljah, take a look at all the government, of many different countries, as well as people who have no link to governments that sell weapons to Africa and other places and you will see that the U.S. is not the only one, nor is it the biggest seller of weapons to countries such as Africa....
A Ban on Private Ownership of Military Weapons Including Assault Rifles and Grenade Launchers? Bush Administration Just Says NO!
John Bolton, the U.S. undersecretary of state for arms control, bluntly told the delegates that “The United States will not join consensus on a final document that contains measures contrary to our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.” He also said the United States, the largest supplier of arms worldwide, would not support moves to outlaw any arming of rebel groups, nor would it help fund a campaign by human rights groups to raise awareness of the trade. He also said the U.S. would not support a ban on private ownership of military weapons, including assault rifles and grenade launchers.
UN Conference on Small Arms
The Conference, held July 9-20, 2001, began on a rather sour tone with the statement of U.S. Under Secretary of State John Bolton, who expressed the U.S. position on the issue of small arms and the Conference in no uncertain terms. Bolton stressed that the Conference should address only the illicit transfer of military style weapons, excluding firearms and non-military rifles (the weapons responsible for terrible carnage and destruction around the world every year).
Bolton bluntly stated the position of the United States in front of the ministerial-level portion of the meeting, describing the U.S. “redlines,” items unacceptable for inclusion in the Conference plan. Bolton stated that the United States could not support a final Conference document that included:
- restrictions on the legal trade and manufacture of small arms and light weapons;
- promotion of international advocacy by NGOs and international organizations;
- restrictions on the sale of small arms and light weapons to entities other than governments;
- a mandatory review conference; and
- a commitment to begin discussions on legally binding agreements.