It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
Originally posted by LilDudeissocool
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
Hey lil dude, pm me on my aol account or here or the other sites I’m on, like I told you, my yahoo was compromised as well as my Google account, come to find out, its some guy name 'sbroadbent' who keeps pm me from his cell phone, I think he got the info from my application about 5 months ago, real weirdo, threaten me with’ I know your isp address’ amongst other things. Look at the other sites I’m on, doing a special thread on this situation, its going to be called ‘Be careful which forums you give your information to’ .
So tell me lil dude ,do you think it’s a flare, in the op?
My accounts are under investigation,and i dont have your email,can you do this today,thanks unc.
What do I think that thing is in the video, flares? No. Maybe something created with the focus adjustment. On second thought they could be flares that were recorded out of focus. Other than that it looks like lights reflecting off a yellow party balloon.
So basically your saying flares spin around and a yellow ballons uluminate the whole sky..with lights reflecting from it huh.
And why do i have to be lil dude is so cool,why i cant be bobe this week?
Originally posted by ArMaP
Are you also familiar with how an out of focus light appears on different cameras?
Originally posted by AsimpleAbstraction
I am a professional video-editor, I am familiar with aperture techniques, lens flares and editing tricks. I have never seen anything like this before. Some of the artifacts in the close-zoom footage are definitely camera-induced (small pixelations) as well as the hard edge that the object has.
It's also the result of the light being out of focus, as the darker top.
Also the stationary dark spot residing in the bottom of the object is quite odd.
You can see how that happens in a Canon MV730i in the video below.
Because an our of focus light will look the same when seen through another camera with the same type of lens.
Why is there multiple video sourcing the exact same thing?
Some time ago I could even recognise a Sony camera by the shape the out of focus lights showed.
They can be observant and stupid, although I don't mean that's what happened in this case. People's reactions are the result of their personality, so we cannot really know why they reacted like they did. Maybe they had a predisposition to be awed by something like this.
People are observant, not stupid. Why would these [multiple] people be awing over something so simple?
Edit: YouTube resized the video (and in this case it made it bigger), so it looks even worse than it was originally. If anyone wants it I can provide the original, unedited (I removed the sound) and unconverted video.edit on 12/3/2011 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by vinunleaded
It's not because of the distance, it's because it's not on focus, as you can see on the video I posted here.
Originally posted by vinunleaded
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
Yea I did some wedding photography for a while so most of my samples are romantic themed
Originally posted by vinunleaded
"I wonder how many search and rescue missions are in the day time?"
If there's at least one happen everyday then 365 missions a year, 3650 missions in 10 years
"are all of these flares?"
No. But not flare doesnt automatically mean aliens or God either.
You cant just lump a whole bunch of videos together to make your case. If you want to discuss those videos then you can make a thread for each of themedit on 17-3-2011 by vinunleaded because: (no reason given)
TextYou cant just lump a whole bunch of videos together to make your case. If you want to discuss those videos then you can make a thread for each of them
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
Originally posted by vinunleaded
"I wonder how many search and rescue missions are in the day time?"
If there's at least one happen everyday then 365 missions a year, 3650 missions in 10 years
"are all of these flares?"
No. But not flare doesnt automatically mean aliens or God either.
You cant just lump a whole bunch of videos together to make your case. If you want to discuss those videos then you can make a thread for each of themedit on 17-3-2011 by vinunleaded because: (no reason given)
Thank you 'Skeptic over lord' for explaining that to me,but its stupid to do a thread on these videos being though they are already on the ats.,and im not proving a point,the point is already, and has already been proven.
Hopefully one day you will own a sight of your own,then you can dictate what happens!!!!
TextYou cant just lump a whole bunch of videos together to make your case. If you want to discuss those videos then you can make a thread for each of them
Originally posted by vinunleaded
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
You really want to know what’s garbage , and what’s really sad,’ I swear to god ‘every time I come on here, I feel all the time, as if I’m in a ‘Get Smart’ episode and its some as hole deep in the earth saying !!!
Ill use the old…>flare in the sky debate!!
Ill use the old…>plane in the air trick!!
Ill use the old…>flare in the day time debate!!!
Ill use the old…>56,000 foot lamp post in the sky trick!!
Ill use the old…> Chinese lantern, in winter, in Mississippi trick!!!
Ill uses the old, over and over and over and over and over.
GO GO Gadget, flare in the sky
GO GO gadget, Chinese lanterns
All forums remind me of get smart for some reason, like there reading from a scripted well written script of about 500 ways to counter a video if found to be credible…‘GO GO GADGET DEBUNKERS’
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
I wonder how many search and rescue missions are in the day time?
are all of these flares?